ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2019
Variability of apparent diffusion coefficient in the brain in women during follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Menstrual cycle-driven hormone concentrations co-fluctuate with white and gray matter architecture changes across the whole brain.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Ovarian steroid hormones: A long overlooked but critical contributor to brain aging and Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the variability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the brain in women during follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle.
methodsThe present study included 32 females of reproductive age with regular menstruation. The participants were divided into two groups as group 1: females in the follicular phase, and group 2: females in the luteal phase. The regions of interest were manually drawn on the structures of the T2-weighted images (frontal gray and white matter, parietal gray and white matter, temporal gray and white matter, occipital gray and white matter, cerebellar gray and white matter, caudate nucleus, putamen, thalamus, internal capsule, pons, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the frontal and in the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle and CSF in the middle part of the lateral ventricle). ADC values were averaged for each patient. We used Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA for more than two groups but used Mann Whitney U test for comparison of ADC values between the group of 18 females in the follicular phase and the group of 14 females in the luteal phase.
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of the ADC value of each neuroanatomic structure that was evaluated.
conclusionWe did not determine a significant difference among volunteers at the two different phases of the menstrual cycle in terms of ADC values measured from different regions of the brain. However, although not statistically significant, ADC values measured from almost all parts of the brain were higher at the luteal phase than at the follicular phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.