Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560892›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

High-resolution deconstruction of evolution induced by chemotherapy treatments in breast cancer xenografts.

Hyunsoo Kim, Pooja Kumar, Francesca Menghi, Javad Noorbakhsh, Eliza Cerveira, Mallory Ryan, Qihui Zhu, Guruprasad Ananda, Joshy George, Henry C Chen and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Power and Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts of Human Breast Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Genomic and epigenomicScience translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Treating Cancer as an Invasive Species.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyunsoo KimThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Pooja KumarThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Francesca MenghiThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Javad NoorbakhshThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6196-8061
Eliza CerveiraThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Mallory RyanThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Qihui ZhuThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Guruprasad AnandaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Joshy GeorgeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-4856
Henry C ChenIn Vivo Services, JAX® Mice, Clinical & Research Services, The Jackson Laboratory, Sacramento, CA, 95838, USA.
Susan MockusThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Chengsheng ZhangThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Yan YangIn Vivo Services, JAX® Mice, Clinical & Research Services, The Jackson Laboratory, Sacramento, CA, 95838, USA.
James KeckIn Vivo Services, JAX® Mice, Clinical & Research Services, The Jackson Laboratory, Sacramento, CA, 95838, USA.
R Krishna Murthy KaruturiThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-756X
Carol J BultThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Charles LeeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Edison T LiuThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Jeffrey H ChuangThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA. jeff.chuang@jax.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-2358
Jackson Laboratory · USEwha Womans University · KR

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
PDXNet Data Commons and Coordinating CenterU24CA224067 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Jeffrey Hsu-Min Chuang · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Quantitative Computational Methods to Accurately Measure Tumor Heterogeneity in Solid Tumors to Inform Development of Evolution-based Treatment StrategiesR01CA230031 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHUANG, JEFFREY HSU-MIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Dissection of Tumor Evolution Using Patient-Derived XenograftsR21CA191848 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHUANG, JEFFREY HSU-MIN · 2015 to 2016
$531k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230031NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191848NCI NIH HHS U24 CA224067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes by which tumors evolve are essential to the efficacy of treatment, but quantitative understanding of intratumoral dynamics has been limited. Although intratumoral heterogeneity is common, quantification of evolution is difficult from clinical samples because treatment replicates cannot be performed and because matched serial samples are infrequently available. To circumvent these problems we derived and assayed large sets of human triple-negative breast cancer xenografts and cell cultures from two patients, including 86 xenografts from cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, docetaxel, or vehicle treatment cohorts as well as 45 related cell cultures. We assayed these samples via exome-seq and/or high-resolution droplet digital PCR, allowing us to distinguish complex therapy-induced selection and drift processes among endogenous cancer subclones with cellularity uncertainty <3%. For one patient, we discovered two predominant subclones that were granularly intermixed in all 48 co-derived xenograft samples. These two subclones exhibited differential chemotherapy sensitivity-when xenografts were treated with cisplatin for 3 weeks, the post-treatment volume change was proportional to the post-treatment ratio of subclones on a xenograft-to-xenograft basis. A subsequent cohort in which xenografts were treated with cisplatin, allowed a drug holiday, then treated a second time continued to exhibit this proportionality. In contrast, xenografts from other treatment cohorts, spatially dissected xenograft fragments, and cell cultures evolved in diverse ways but with substantial population bottlenecks. These results show that ecosystems susceptible to successive retreatment can arise spontaneously in breast cancer in spite of a background of irregular subclonal bottlenecks, and our work provides to our knowledge the first quantification of the population genetics of such a system. Intriguingly, in such an ecosystem the ratio of common subclones is predictive of the state of treatment susceptibility, showing how measurements of subclonal heterogeneity could guide treatment for some patients.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorClonal EvolutionDisease Models, AnimalDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMiceMutationTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30560892
PMCPMC6298990
OpenAlexW2904615282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.