ArticleScientific reports2018
Auditory figure-ground analysis in rostral belt and parabelt of the macaque monkey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical transformations in sound envelope encoding differ across cortical layers.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
- Interareal and interlaminar differences in sound envelope encoding in core and parabelt auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Predicting speech-in-noise ability with static and dynamic auditory figure-ground analysis using structural equation modelling.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Two Prediction Error Systems in the Nonlemniscal Inferior Colliculus: "Spectral" and "Nonspectral".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Change detection in the primate auditory cortex through feedback of prediction error signals.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023Review
- Functional network properties of the auditory cortex.Hearing research · 2023Review
- Predicting speech-in-noise ability in normal and impaired hearing based on auditory cognitive measures.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Neuronal figure-ground responses in primate primary auditory cortex.Cell reports · 2021Article
- MRI monitoring of macaque monkeys in neuroscience: Case studies, resource and normative data comparisons.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Difficulties with Speech-in-Noise Perception Related to Fundamental Grouping Processes in Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Simultaneous auditory agnosia: Systematic description of a new type of auditory segregation deficit following a right hemisphere lesion.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021Article
- Pitch and Duration Mismatch Negativity are Associated With Distinct Auditory Cortex and Inferior Frontal Cortex Volumes in the First-Episode Schizophrenia Spectrum.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2021Article
- How Can Hearing Loss Cause Dementia?Neuron · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segregating the key features of the natural world within crowded visual or sound scenes is a critical aspect of everyday perception. The neurobiological bases for auditory figure-ground segregation are poorly understood. We demonstrate that macaques perceive an acoustic figure-ground stimulus with comparable performance to humans using a neural system that involves high-level auditory cortex, localised to the rostral belt and parabelt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.