Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560780›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Multifactorial processes underlie parallel opsin loss in neotropical bats.

Alexa Sadier, Kalina Tj Davies, Laurel R Yohe, Kun Yun, Paul Donat, Brandon P Hedrick, Elizabeth R Dumont, Liliana M Dávalos, Stephen J Rossiter, Karen E Sears

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Insect opsins and evo-devo: what have we learned in 25 years?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Non-model systems in mammalian forelimb evo-devo.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Loss of sweet taste despite the conservation of sweet receptor genes in insectivorous bats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Making a bat: The developmental basis of bat evolution.Genetics and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  18. A Fruitful Endeavor: Scent Cues and Echolocation Behavior Used byIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexa Sadier *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9907-3714
Kalina Tj Davies *School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4258-4775
Laurel R YoheDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-8749
Kun YunDepartment of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States.
Paul DonatDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York, United States.
Brandon P HedrickDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-3405
Elizabeth R DumontSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7809-388X
Liliana M DávalosDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, New York, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-7697
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-4515
Karen E SearsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-9602
Queen Mary University of London · GBStony Brook University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USYale University · US

Funding

European Research Council 310482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of previously adaptive traits is typically linked to relaxation in selection, yet the molecular steps leading to such repeated losses are rarely known. Molecular studies of loss have tended to focus on gene sequences alone, but overlooking other aspects of protein expression might underestimate phenotypic diversity. Insights based almost solely on opsin gene evolution, for instance, have made mammalian color vision a textbook example of phenotypic loss. We address this gap by investigating retention and loss of opsin genes, transcripts, and proteins across ecologically diverse noctilionoid bats. We find multiple, independent losses of short-wave-sensitive opsins. Mismatches between putatively functional DNA sequences, mRNA transcripts, and proteins implicate transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes in the ongoing loss of S-opsins in some noctilionoid bats. Our results provide a snapshot of evolution in progress during phenotypic trait loss, and suggest vertebrate visual phenotypes cannot always be predicted from genotypes alone.

Indexed as

Tropical ClimateAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase Pair MismatchBayes TheoremChiropteraEvolution, MolecularExonsOpen Reading FramesOpsinsPhylogenyProtein BiosynthesisRNA, MessengerOpsinsRNA, Messengeradaptive radiationchiropteracolor visionevolutionary biologypost-transcriptional processes

Identifiers

PMID30560780
PMCPMC6333445
OpenAlexW2904375300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.