ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2019
Evaluation of Two HIV Rapid Diagnostic Tests in a Context of Strains' Genetic Diversity in Mali.
Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of Xpert HIV-1 viral load test in Senegal: a country of high circulation of CRF02_AG.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- High Prevalence of Anal Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Living in Bamako, Mali.Infectious agents and cancer · 2021Article
- Neuropathic pain in Mali: The current situation, comprehensive hypothesis, which therapeutic strategy for Africa?eNeurologicalSci · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid diagnostic tests used in most resource-limited countries offer little specificity in the differentiation of HIV-1, HIV-2, and HIV-1 + 2. World Health Organization (WHO) does periodically evaluate rapid tests in use in the South Countries. Despite the prequalification from WHO, it is necessary at local level to conduct comparative studies between the available tests. To do this in Mali, we conducted a cross-sectional study at the University Teaching Hospital Gabriel Touré and the Research and Training Center (SEREFO) of Bamako on 172 samples from retrospective and prospective studies. The goal of this project was to compare the following rapid tests: "HIV TRI-DOT" and OnSite HIV1/2 Ab Plus Combo Rapid Test for screening HIV-1 and HIV-2 to "ImmunoComb II BiSpot" (gold standard). The sensibility and specificity of "HIV TRI-DOT" for HIV-1 detection were 100% each [95% confidence interval (CI): 87.13-100 and 95.31-100]. Its performance for HIV-2 detection was 95.24% (95% CI: 84.21-98.68) (sensibility) and 100% (95% CI: 72.25-100) (specificity). The positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 100% (95% CI: 91.24-100) and 83.33% (95% CI: 55.20-95.30). The sensibility and specificity of OnSite HIV1/2 Ab Plus Combo Rapid Test assay performance were 100% (95% CI: 87.13-100 and 95.31-100). Overall, OnSite HIV ½ Ab Combo Rapid Test proved to be a good test for warm countries and does not require refrigeration in these settings. Blood and its products can be used to perform the test, unlike "ImmunoComb II BiSpot" and "HIV TRI-DOT," which must be kept cold and cannot be done with whole blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.