Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560582›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.

Alicia Isabel I Fayad, Daniel G Buamscha, Agustín Ciapponi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia Isabel I FayadPediatric Nephrology, Ricardo Gutierrez Children's Hospital, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Los Incas Av 4174, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1427.
Daniel G Buamscha
Agustín Ciapponi
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARGarrahan Hospital · ARHospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common condition among patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and is associated with high death. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a blood purification technique used to treat the most severe forms of AKI. The optimal time to initiate RRT so as to improve clinical outcomes remains uncertain.This review complements another Cochrane review by the same authors: Intensity of continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury.

objectivesTo assess the effects of different timing (early and standard) of RRT initiation on death and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with AKI. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register to 23 August 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched LILACS to 11 September 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We included all patients with AKI in ICU regardless of age, comparing early versus standard RRT initiation. For safety and cost outcomes we planned to include cohort studies and non-RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two authors. The random-effects model was used and results were reported as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsWe included five studies enrolling 1084 participants. Overall, most domains were assessed as being at low or unclear risk of bias. Compared to standard treatment, early initiation may reduce the risk of death at day 30, although the 95% CI does not rule out an increased risk (5 studies, 1084 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.13; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsBased mainly on low quality of evidence identified, early RRT may reduce the risk of death and may improve the recovery of kidney function in critically patients with AKI, however the 95% CI indicates that early RRT might worsen these outcomes. There was an increased risk of adverse events with early RRT. Further adequate-powered RCTs using appropriate criteria to define the optimal time of RRT are needed to reduce the imprecision of the results.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionRenal Replacement TherapyTime FactorsWithholding Treatment

Identifiers

PMID30560582
PMCPMC6517263
OpenAlexW2904833028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.