Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560534›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Foliar uptake of arsenic nanoparticles by spinach: an assessment of physiological and human health risk implications.

Natasha, Muhammad Shahid, Camille Dumat, Sana Khalid, Faiz Rabbani, Abu Bakr Umer Farooq, Muhammad Amjad, Ghulam Abbas, Nabeel Khan Niazi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

NatashaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShahidDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan. shahidzeeshan@gmail.com.
Camille DumatCentre d'Etude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir (CERTOP), UMR5044, Université J. Jaurès - Toulouse II, 5 allée Antonio Machado, 31058, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Sana KhalidDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Faiz RabbaniDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Abu Bakr Umer FarooqDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Muhammad AmjadDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Ghulam AbbasDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Vehari campus, Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Nabeel Khan NiaziInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan.
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKCentre d'Étude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir · FRUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric contamination by heavy metal(loid)-enriched particulate matter (metal-PM) is highly topical these days because of its high persistence, toxic nature, and health risks. Globally, foliar uptake of metal(loid)s occurs for vegetables/crops grown in the vicinity of industrial or urban areas with a metal-PM-contaminated atmosphere. The current study evaluated the foliar uptake of arsenic (As), accumulation of As in different plant organs, its toxicity (in terms of ROS generation, chlorophyll degradation, and lipid peroxidation), and its defensive mechanism (antioxidant enzymes) in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) after foliar application of As in the form of nanoparticles (As-NPs). The As-NPs were prepared using a chemical method. Results indicate that spinach can absorb As via foliar pathways (0.50 to 0.73 mg/kg in leaves) and can translocate it towards root tissues (0.35 to 0.68 mg/kg). However, health risk assessment parameters showed that the As level in the edible parts of spinach was below the critical limit (hazard quotient < 1). Despite low tissue level, As-NP exposure caused phytotoxicity in terms of a decrease in plant dry biomass (up to 84%) and pigment contents (up to 38%). Furthermore, several-fold higher activities of antioxidant enzymes were observed under metal stress than control. However, no significant variation was observed in the level of hydrogen peroxide (H

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAir PollutantsArsenicChlorophyllDietary ExposureEnzymesFood ContaminationHumansHydrogen PeroxideLipid PeroxidationPlant LeavesPlant RootsRisk AssessmentSpinacia oleraceaAir PollutantsArsenicChlorophyllEnzymesHydrogen PeroxideArsenicFoliar applicationNanoparticlesOxidative stressSpinach

Identifiers

PMID30560534
OpenAlexW2905286838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.