Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560453›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients.

Martin Sutter, Andreas Eggspuehler, Dezsoe Jeszenszky, Frank Kleinstueck, Tamàs F Fekete, Daniel Haschtmann, François Porchet, Jiri Dvorak

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraoperative neuromonitoring in degenerative cervical myelopathy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and postoperative neurological outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and patient-related outcomes in thoracic spinal meningiomas surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends and Demographic Disparities in the Utilization of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the United States, 2008 to 2021.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Consensus for management of sacral fractures: from the diagnosis to the treatment, with a focus on the role of decompression in sacral fractures.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin SutterSpine Unit, Department of Neurology, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas EggspuehlerSpine Unit, Department of Neurology, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dezsoe JeszenszkySpine Unit, Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank KleinstueckSpine Unit, Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tamàs F FeketeSpine Unit, Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel HaschtmannSpine Unit, Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
François PorchetSpine Unit, Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jiri DvorakSpine Unit, Department of Neurology, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. jiri@dvorakmedical.com.
Schulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe compared the value of different uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) methods on the detection of neurological complications during spine surgery.

methodsIONM data derived from sensory spinal and cortical evoked potentials combined with continuous electromyography monitoring, motor evoked potentials and spinal recording were evaluated in relation to subsequent post-operative neurological changes. Patients were categorised based on their true-positive or true-negative post-operative neurological status.

resultsIn 2728 consecutive patients we had 909 (33.3%) IONM alerts. We had 8 false negatives (0.3%) with post-operative radicular deficit that completely recovered within 3 months, except for one. There was no false negative for spinal cord injury. 107 were true positives, and 23 were false positives. Multimodal IONM sensitivity and specificity were 93.0% and 99.1%, respectively. The frequency of neurological complications including minor deficits was 4.2% (n = 115), of which 0.37% (n = 10) were permanent. Analysis of the single IONM modalities varied between 13 and 81% to detect neurological complications compared with 93% when using all modalities.

conclusionMultimodal IONM is more effective and accurate in assessing spinal cord and nerve root function during spine surgeries to reduce both neurological complications and false-negative findings compared to unimodal monitoring. We recommend multimodal IONM in all complex spine surgeries. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Intraoperative ComplicationsIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringNeurosurgical ProceduresHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpineComplicationsIntraoperative neuromonitoringSensitivitySpecificitySpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID30560453
OpenAlexW2904679855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.