Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560430›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2019

Influence of bone densitometry on the anti-osteoporosis treatment after fragility hip fracture.

Peiwen Wang, Yizhong Li, Huafeng Zhuang, Haiming Yu, Siqing Cai, Hao Xu, Zhenhui Chen, Jinkuang Lin, Xuedong Yao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peiwen WangThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Yizhong LiThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China. doctorlyz@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4950-5937
Huafeng ZhuangThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Haiming YuThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Siqing CaiThe Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Hao XuThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Zhenhui ChenThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Jinkuang LinThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Xuedong YaoThe Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhongshan North Road 34, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

Fujian Province Health and Family Planning Commission 2015 CXB 18Population and Family Planning Commission of Shandong Province (CN) 2016-1-68Quanzhou Science and Technology Bureau 2015Z58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFragility fracture significantly increases risk of future fracture. The fragility fracture cycle should be disrupted. The secondary fracture prevention is important for the patients with fragility hip fracture. The pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis is important for prevention of new fracture. However, many patients with hip fracture do not receive osteoporosis treatment. This retrospective study investigates the influence of bone mineral density (BMD) assessment on the initiation of anti-osteoporosis medications in the hospitalized patients with fragility hip fracture.

methodsThis retrospective research enrolled 1211 patients with fragility hip fracture 50 years of age and older. Among 1211 patients aged from 50 to 103 years with the average age of 77.83 ± 9.95 years, there were 807 females and 404 males. There were 634 fractures of femoral neck and 577 intertrochanteric fractures of femur. We examined whether patients had received bone mineral density assessment and received anti-osteoporosis therapy during the period of hospitalization. The patients were divided into BMD assessment group and no BMD assessment group. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared with t test. All parameters of groups were compared with Chi-square test.

resultsOf 1211 patients, 331 (27.33%) had received BMD assessment and 925 (76.38%) had received anti-osteoporosis drugs during the period of hospitalization. The rate of bisphosphonate use was lower and only 11.31% in the total patients. The anti-osteoporosis treatment rate was 93.66% in the patients receiving BMD assessment and 69.89% in the patients without BMD assessment (p < 0.01). The zoledronate use significantly increased from 6.7% in the patients without BMD assessment to 23.56% in the patients receiving BMD assessment (p < 0.01).

conclusionsBMD assessment is a good basis for communication between patients and orthopedic surgeons. BMD assessment significantly increases the initiation of osteoporosis treatment and bisphosphonate use in the patients with hip fracture during the period of hospitalization.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityDiphosphonatesFemaleFemurFemur NeckHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionDiphosphonatesBone mineral density assessmentHip fractureOsteoporosisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30560430
PMCPMC6763573
OpenAlexW2904689263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.