ReviewDer Internist2019
[Management of osseous complications in multiple myeloma].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Which factors are associated with adverse prognosis in multiple myeloma patients after surgery? - preliminary establishment and validation of the nomogram.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis of the Key Genes and Pathways in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Hotspots and trends in multiple myeloma bone diseases: A bibliometric visualization analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Multiple myeloma characterized by synovial fibrinoid necrosis: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal lesions caused by multiple myeloma often lead to pain, pathological fractures, spinal instability, and compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. The choice of therapy options is made by an interdisciplinary basis with oncologists and radiotherapists on the basis of comorbidities, prognosis, localization, and number of lesions. Surgical management has a supportive role in pain relief, the prevention and treatment of pathological fractures, and the decompression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. An adequate preoperative workup is essential for planning surgical treatment, which includes magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. In the case of unstable spinal lesions, minimally invasive and open surgical procedures, as well as their combination, are available for stabilization and decompression. In impending and pathological fractures of the extremities, surgical procedures are superior to conservative therapy for pain relief, restoring stability, walking ability, and limb function. There are multiple options available, including osteosynthesis using bone cement and plates, intramedullary nails, and bone replacement with implants and tumor endoprostheses with good functional results. Permanent reconstruction of the lesions should be the goal of any surgical intervention. The indication for curative, wide resection of the tumor should be considered for solitary plasmocytomas of the bone. Adjuvant radiotherapy leads to significantly improved local tumor control and should be considered after resection and stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.