ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Diagnostic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided kidney transplant biopsy using cortex-only view: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Biopsy Under Deep Intravenous or Oral Conscious Sedation: Which Is the Best Option for Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsies: a monocentric retrospective study about 109 consecutive patients.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Radiologic evaluation of the kidney transplant donor and recipient.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- [Renal Biopsy].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Review
- The Tangential Extraperitoneal Retrorenal Approach in Kidney Transplant Biopsy: An Observational Study to Assess Complication and Adequacy Rates.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ TransplantationObservational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCortical biopsy is the cornerstone to reveal a cause of unexplained dysfunction of the kidney transplant. Nevertheless, only a few studies have reported the biopsy technique with its performance. We described a novel technique of ultrasound (US)-guided kidney transplant biopsy using cortex-only view and analyzed its diagnostic efficacy and safety. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween January 2014 and December 2016, a consecutive series of 188 patients who underwent US-guided kidney transplant biopsy using cortex-only view by an experienced radiologist were evaluated (mean age, 46.1 ± 12.5 years; range, 21-79 years). Biopsy time, biopsy distance, biopsy core number, and glomerular number per patient were recorded. Successful biopsy (e.g., adequate, 10 or more glomeruli; marginal, 7-9 glomeruli) and complication rates were investigated, using Banff criteria and Clavien-Dindo classification, respectively.
resultsMean biopsy time, distance, and core number were 20.6 ± 6.7 min (range, 10-44 min), 3.2 ± 0.7 cm (range, 2.1-5.4 cm), and 1.9 ± 0.3 (range, 1.0-3.0), respectively. Mean glomerular number per patient was 20.4 ± 10.0 (range, 0-54). Adequate and marginal biopsy rates were 87.2% (164/188) and 95.2% (179/188), respectively. There was no major complication requiring treatment (no patient with Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater complication), while there were self-limiting minor complications in 5 patients (overall complication rate, 2.7%).
conclusionUS-guided biopsy using cortex-only view is feasible and safe in sampling cortical tissues of kidney transplant. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound (US)-guided kidney transplant biopsy using cortex-only view is feasible and safe. • Adequate and marginal biopsy rates were 87.2% and 95.2%, respectively. • No major complication requiring treatment occurred after biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30560360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.