Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560309›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019

Phthalate Exposure in Pregnant Women: Risk Perception and Preventive Advice of Perinatal Health Professionals.

Cécile Marie, Didier Lémery, Françoise Vendittelli, Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile MarieUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Biostatistique, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. cecilemarie63@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0062-1152
Didier LémeryUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Gynécologie-obstétrique, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Françoise VendittelliUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Service de Gynécologie-obstétrique, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Marie-Pierre Sauvant-RochatUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, Faculté de Pharmacie, Département de Santé Publique et Environnement, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The main objective of the PERI-HELPE study (Perception of Risk-HEaLth Professionals and Environment Study) was to describe the knowledge of perinatal health professionals about phthalates and the preventive advice they give to pregnant women about exposure to these chemicals. The secondary objective was to determine whether giving preventive advice was associated with the perception of phthalates. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in 2015 in France. One hundred and eighty-nine perinatal health professionals (obstetricians, midwives and general practitioners) replied to an online self-administered questionnaire (participation rate: 11%). Results Only 17% of health professionals felt able to provide appropriate answers to pregnant women about phthalates. Advice was given by 23% (avoid plastic kitchen cling film) to 75% (prefer homemade dishes) about eating habits, by less than 42% for the use of cosmetics and less than 25% for that of consumer products. After adjusting for covariates, the awareness that pregnant women are daily exposed to phthalates (44% of professionals) was associated with dietary advice [avoid pre-packaged food (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.4), prefer homemade dishes (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-5.9) and avoid plastic kitchen cling film (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.0-5.6)] but not with advice about cosmetics or consumer products. The perception of phthalate exposure as a high risk (66%) was not associated with preventive advice. Conclusions for Practice Our sample size was not very large but the findings nevertheless show the lack of knowledge of perinatal health professionals about phthalates. If they are to take on a preventive role, health professionals in France need to be better informed about phthalates and more fully trained in environmental health in general.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFranceHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPerinatal CarePhthalic AcidsPregnancyPregnant PeopleRisk AssessmentSurveys and Questionnairesphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsEnvironmental healthPerinatal health professionalsPhthalatesPreventive adviceRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID30560309
OpenAlexW2905490242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.