ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2018
Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does plantar skin abrasion affect cutaneous mechanosensation?Physiological reports · 2022Article
- The Effect of Subliminal Electrical Noise Stimulation on Plantar Vibration Sensitivity in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Vibration Perception Thresholds of Skin Mechanoreceptors Are Influenced by Different Contact Forces.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The effects of mechanical noise bandwidth on balance across flat and compliant surfaces.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Postural performance and plantar cutaneous vibration perception in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.Heliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDeterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that subliminal electrical and mechanical noise applied to the sole of the foot of healthy elderly subjects improves vibration perception thresholds (VPT).
methodsVPTs of 99 healthy elderly subjects were measured at 30 Hz at the heel and first metatarsal head (MET I). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: vibration (Vi-G), current (Cu-G), control (Co-G), placebo-vibration (Pl-Vi), and placebo-current (Pl-Cu). Vi-G and Cu-G were stimulated using 90% (subliminal) of their individual perception thresholds for five minutes in a standing position. Co-G received no stimulation. The placebo groups were treated with mock stimulation. VPTs were measured twice before the intervention (baseline (BASE) and pre-measurement (PRE)), and once after the intervention (post-measurement (POST)).
resultsSignificant differences were found between measurement conditions comparing BASE and POST, and PRE and POST. VPTs between groups within each measurement condition showed no significant differences. Vi-G was the only group that showed significantly higher VPTs in POST compared to BASE and PRE, which contradicts previous studies.
conclusionWe analyzed increased VPTs after subliminal mechanical stimulation. The pressure load of standing for five minutes combined with subliminal stimulation may have shifted the initial level of mechanoreceptor sensitivity, which may lead to a deterioration of the VPT. The subliminal electrical stimulation had no effect on VPT. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on our results, we cannot confirm positive effects of subliminal electrical or mechanical stimulation on the sole of the foot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.