Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560218›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2018

Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects.

Claudio Zippenfennig, Laura Niklaus, Katrin Karger, Thomas L Milani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudio ZippenfennigFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Professorship of Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.
Laura NiklausFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Professorship of Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.
Katrin KargerFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Professorship of Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.
Thomas L MilaniFaculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Professorship of Human Locomotion, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.
Chemnitz University of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that subliminal electrical and mechanical noise applied to the sole of the foot of healthy elderly subjects improves vibration perception thresholds (VPT).

methodsVPTs of 99 healthy elderly subjects were measured at 30 Hz at the heel and first metatarsal head (MET I). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: vibration (Vi-G), current (Cu-G), control (Co-G), placebo-vibration (Pl-Vi), and placebo-current (Pl-Cu). Vi-G and Cu-G were stimulated using 90% (subliminal) of their individual perception thresholds for five minutes in a standing position. Co-G received no stimulation. The placebo groups were treated with mock stimulation. VPTs were measured twice before the intervention (baseline (BASE) and pre-measurement (PRE)), and once after the intervention (post-measurement (POST)).

resultsSignificant differences were found between measurement conditions comparing BASE and POST, and PRE and POST. VPTs between groups within each measurement condition showed no significant differences. Vi-G was the only group that showed significantly higher VPTs in POST compared to BASE and PRE, which contradicts previous studies.

conclusionWe analyzed increased VPTs after subliminal mechanical stimulation. The pressure load of standing for five minutes combined with subliminal stimulation may have shifted the initial level of mechanoreceptor sensitivity, which may lead to a deterioration of the VPT. The subliminal electrical stimulation had no effect on VPT. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on our results, we cannot confirm positive effects of subliminal electrical or mechanical stimulation on the sole of the foot.

Indexed as

MechanoreceptorsSensory perceptionStochastic resonanceSubliminal noise stimulationVibration perception threshold

Identifiers

PMID30560218
PMCPMC6222028
OpenAlexW2898402821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.