Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30560204›Full record

ArticleMDM policy & practice

Designing Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Dissemination and Sustainment: Can Implementation Science Help Translate Shared Decision Making Into Routine Practice?

Andy S L Tan, Kathleen M Mazor, Daniel McDonald, Stella J Lee, Demetria McNeal, Daniel D Matlock, Russell E Glasgow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Undergraduate Oncology Education: A Pedagogical Framework.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Optimizing the design and implementation of question prompt lists to support person-centred care: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect of a Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for African-American Men in Primary Care Settings.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andy S L TanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Population Sciences Division, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-6171
Kathleen M MazorMeyers Primary Care Institute, a joint Endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group, and Fallon Health, Worcester, NA.
Daniel McDonaldDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Population Sciences Division, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA.
Stella J LeeDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Population Sciences Division, Center for Community-Based Research, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6716-1998
Demetria McNealDissemination and Implementation Science Program, Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Daniel D MatlockDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Russell E GlasgowVA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, CO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) is not widely practiced in routine care due to a variety of organizational, provider, patient, and contextual factors. This article explores how implementation science-which encourages attention to the multilevel contextual factors that influence the adoption, implementation, and sustainment of health care practices-can provide useful insights for increasing SDM use in routine practice. We engaged with stakeholders representing different organizations and geographic locations over three phases: 1) multidisciplinary workgroup meeting comprising researchers and clinicians (

Indexed as

implementation scienceshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID30560204
PMCPMC6291870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.