ArticleBrain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)2018
Improving P300 Spelling Rate using Language Models and Predictive Spelling.
Article in Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- ChatBCI, a P300 speller BCI with context-driven word prediction leveraging large language models, from concept to evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Near-optimal P300 speller performance using large language models: A multi-model analysis with performance bounds.PloS one · 2026Article
- Towards Predictive Communication: The Fusion of Large Language Models and Brain-Computer Interface.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- EEG Baseline Analysis for Effective Extraction of P300 Event-Related Potentials for Welfare Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Deep Learning Performance for P300 Neural Signal Classification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Extending Brain-Computer Interface Access with a Multilingual Language Model in the P300 Speller.Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) · 2022Article
- Classification of Facial Expressions for Intended Display of Emotions Using Brain-Computer Interfaces.Annals of neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The P300 Speller Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) provides a means of communication for those suffering from advanced neuromuscular diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Recent literature has incorporated language-based modelling, which uses previously chosen characters and the structure of natural language to modify the interface and classifier. Two complementary methods of incorporating language models have previously been independently studied: predictive spelling uses language models to generate suggestions of complete words to allow for the selection of multiple characters simultaneously, and language model-based classifiers have used prior characters to create a prior probability distribution over the characters based on how likely they are to follow. In this study, we propose a combined method which extends a language-based classifier to generate prior probabilities for both individual characters and complete words. In order to gauge the efficiency of this new model, results across 12 healthy subjects were measured. Incorporating predictive spelling increased typing speed using the P300 speller, with an average increase of 15.5% in typing rate across subjects, demonstrating that language models can be effectively utilized to create full word suggestions for predictive spelling. When combining predictive spelling with language model classification, typing speed is significantly improved, resulting in better typing performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.