Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559900›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2018

Bayesian Adaptive Randomization and Trial Monitoring with Predictive Probability for Time-to-event Endpoint.

Guosheng Yin, Nan Chen, J Jack Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Dysregulated Transcriptional Control in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guosheng YinDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, gyin@hku.hk.
Nan ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A., nchen2@mdanderson.org.
J Jack LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A., jjlee@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the p53 pathway for reversal of oral premalignancyP50CA097007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MYERS, JEFFREY NICHOLAS · 2002 to 2012
$26.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been much development in Bayesian adaptive designs in clinical trials. In the Bayesian paradigm, the posterior predictive distribution characterizes the future possible outcomes given the currently observed data. Based on the interim time-to-event data, we develop a new phase II trial design by combining the strength of both Bayesian adaptive randomization and the predictive probability. By comparing the mean survival times between patients assigned to two treatment arms, more patients are assigned to the better treatment on the basis of adaptive randomization. We continuously monitor the trial using the predictive probability for early termination in the case of superiority or futility. We conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the operating characteristics of four designs: the proposed predictive probability adaptive randomization design, the predictive probability equal randomization design, the posterior probability adaptive randomization design, and the group sequential design. Adaptive randomization designs using predictive probability and posterior probability yield a longer overall median survival time than the group sequential design, but at the cost of a slightly larger sample size. The average sample size using the predictive probability method is generally smaller than that of the posterior probability design.

Indexed as

Bayesian adaptive designClinical trialPowerRandomizationSurvival dataType I errorType II error

Identifiers

PMID30559900
PMCPMC6294453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.