ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Randomized controlled trial on the comparison of chest tube drainage and needle aspiration in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Should we abandon the simple aspiration in favour of chest tube drainage in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive approaches in initial management of pneumothorax in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of Saudi medicinePooled it
- Management of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Department: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Article
- Needle aspiration versus tube thoracostomy in patients with symptomatic primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines for the management of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Management of the Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Current Guidance, Controversies, and Recent Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.Turkish thoracic journal · 2021Article
- An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Review
- New insights into spontaneous pneumothorax: A review.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2021Review
- Needle aspiration for treating iatrogenic pneumothorax after cardiac electronic device implantation: a pilot study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of the chest tube drainage (CTD) and the needle aspiration (NA) in the treatment of primary Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP).
methodsIn a randomized controlled trial, seventy patients suffering SP were divided equally into two subgroups, as follows: (A) CTD and (B) NA. The immediate and one-week rate of the treatments was the primary endpoints. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and incidence of pneumothorax recurrence during one-year follow up were also recorded.
resultsThe immediate success of treatment was 68.5% and 54.2% of patients in CTD and NA groups, respectively that showed no significant difference between study groups (P: 0.16). The complete lung expansion after one week observed in 32 (91.4%) of NA group and 33 (94.2%) patients in CTD group (P: 0.5). Pneumothorax recurrence was detected in 13 patients (4 in NA and 9 in CTD group) (P: 0.11). Mean pain intensity was significantly lower in the NA group at the first hour after the procedure, the first postoperative day and the first week after the intervention (P< 0.001).
conclusionNeedle aspiration (NA) can be applied as a first step treatment in patients with primary SP, considering its advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.