Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559644›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Large-Scale Neuromorphic Spiking Array Processors: A Quest to Mimic the Brain.

Chetan Singh Thakur, Jamal Lottier Molin, Gert Cauwenberghs, Giacomo Indiveri, Kundan Kumar, Ning Qiao, Johannes Schemmel, Runchun Wang, Elisabetta Chicca, Jennifer Olson Hasler and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. An organic artificial cardiomyocyte.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neuromorphic engineering: Artificial brains for artificial intelligence.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feasibility of a Personal Neuromorphic Emulation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chetan Singh ThakurDepartment of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Jamal Lottier MolinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Gert CauwenberghsDepartment of Bioengineering and Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Giacomo IndiveriInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kundan KumarDepartment of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Ning QiaoInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johannes SchemmelKirchhoff Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Runchun WangThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.
Elisabetta ChiccaCognitive Interaction Technology - Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jennifer Olson HaslerSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jae-Sun SeoSchool of Electrical, Computer and Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Shimeng YuSchool of Electrical, Computer and Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Yu CaoSchool of Electrical, Computer and Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
André van SchaikThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.
Ralph Etienne-CummingsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphic engineering (NE) encompasses a diverse range of approaches to information processing that are inspired by neurobiological systems, and this feature distinguishes neuromorphic systems from conventional computing systems. The brain has evolved over billions of years to solve difficult engineering problems by using efficient, parallel, low-power computation. The goal of NE is to design systems capable of brain-like computation. Numerous large-scale neuromorphic projects have emerged recently. This interdisciplinary field was listed among the top 10 technology breakthroughs of 2014 by the MIT Technology Review and among the top 10 emerging technologies of 2015 by the World Economic Forum. NE has two-way goals: one, a scientific goal to understand the computational properties of biological neural systems by using models implemented in integrated circuits (ICs); second, an engineering goal to exploit the known properties of biological systems to design and implement efficient devices for engineering applications. Building hardware neural emulators can be extremely useful for simulating large-scale neural models to explain how intelligent behavior arises in the brain. The principal advantages of neuromorphic emulators are that they are highly energy efficient, parallel and distributed, and require a small silicon area. Thus, compared to conventional CPUs, these neuromorphic emulators are beneficial in many engineering applications such as for the porting of deep learning algorithms for various recognitions tasks. In this review article, we describe some of the most significant neuromorphic spiking emulators, compare the different architectures and approaches used by them, illustrate their advantages and drawbacks, and highlight the capabilities that each can deliver to neural modelers. This article focuses on the discussion of large-scale emulators and is a continuation of a previous review of various neural and synapse circuits (Indiveri et al., 2011). We also explore applications where these emulators have been used and discuss some of their promising future applications.

Indexed as

analog sub-thresholdbrain-inspired computinglarge-scale systemsneuromorphic engineeringspiking neural emulator

Identifiers

PMID30559644
PMCPMC6287454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.