Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559576›Full record

ArticleContemporary educational psychology2018

Longitudinal Predictors of the Overlap between Reading and Math Skills.

Paul T Cirino, Amanda E Child, Kelly Macdonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary educational psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bridging the Connection between Fluency in Reading and Arithmetic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Framing Executive Function as a Construct and its Relation to Academic Achievement.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predicting Risk for Comorbid Reading and Mathematics Disability Using Fluency-Based Screening Assessments.Learning disabilities research & practice : a publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul T CirinoDepartment of Psychology, Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston.
Amanda E ChildDepartment of Psychology, Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston.
Kelly MacdonaldDepartment of Psychology, Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston.

Funding

Conceptual Precursors of Mathematical & Reading OutcomesR03HD050422 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CIRINO, PAUL T · 2007 to 2008
$148k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD050422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predictors of developing reading skill are well known, and there is increasing coherence around predictors of developing math as well. These achievement skills share strong relations. Less knowledge is available regarding the extent to which predictors overlap and predict one another, particularly longitudinally, and across different types of reading and math. We followed kindergarten students (n = 193) for one year, evaluating a range of relevant predictor skills in kindergarten, and a range of relevant achievement outcomes (core, fluency, complex) of reading and math in grade 1. Few predictors differentially predicted math versus reading with some exception (phonological awareness and rapid naming for reading; counting knowledge for math). The pattern was more similar for core and fluency outcomes relative to complex ones. A small set of predictors accounted for much of the overlap among math and reading outcomes, regardless of type (core, fluency, or complex). Results have the potential to inform the development of early screening tools to consider both achievement domains simultaneously, and support the importance of following students identified as at-risk in one domain for their performance in both domains.

Indexed as

comorbiditylongitudinalmathpredictionreading

Identifiers

PMID30559576
PMCPMC6294126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.