Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559375›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

Isotope-dilution mass spectrometry for exact quantification of noncanonical DNA nucleosides.

Franziska R Traube, Sarah Schiffers, Katharina Iwan, Stefanie Kellner, Fabio Spada, Markus Müller, Thomas Carell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spectroscopic and in vitro Investigations of FeChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Epigenetic Anti-Cancer Treatment With a Stabilized Carbocyclic Decitabine Analogue.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franziska R TraubeCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-1941
Sarah SchiffersCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Katharina IwanCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-0620
Stefanie KellnerCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Fabio SpadaCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Markus MüllerCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-3317
Thomas CarellCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CiPSM), Department of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. thomas.carell@lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7898-2831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA contains not only canonical nucleotides but also a variety of modifications of the bases. In particular, cytosine and adenine are frequently modified. Determination of the exact quantity of these noncanonical bases can contribute to the characterization of the state of a biological system, e.g., determination of disease or developmental processes, and is therefore extremely important. Here, we present a workflow that includes detailed description of critical sample preparation steps and important aspects of mass spectrometry analysis and validation. In this protocol, extraction and digestion of DNA by an optimized spin-column and enzyme-based method are described. Isotopically labeled standards are added in the course of DNA digestion, which allows exact quantification by isotope dilution mass spectrometry. To overcome the major bottleneck of such analyses, we developed a short (~14-min-per-sample) ultra-HPLC (UHPLC) and triple quadrupole mass spectrometric (QQQ-MS) method. Easy calculation of the modification abundance in the genome is possible with the provided evaluation sheets. Compared to alternative methods, the quantification procedure presented here allows rapid, ultrasensitive (low femtomole range) and highly reproducible quantification of different nucleosides in parallel. Including sample preparation and evaluation, quantification of DNA modifications can be achieved in less than a week.

Indexed as

AdenineAnimalsCell LineCerebellumChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCytosineDNAHEK293 CellsHumansHydrolysisIndicator Dilution TechniquesIsotope LabelingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNucleosidesPluripotent Stem CellsAdenineCytosineDNANucleosides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.