Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559343›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2018

Costs and benefits of Papacarie in pediatric dentistry: a randomized clinical trial.

Fernanda Bottega, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Iara Denise Endruweit Battisti, Eusélia Paveglio Vieira, Tiago Szambelan Pompeo, Eliane Roseli Winkelmann

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernanda BottegaRegional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ), Ijuí, RS, Brazil.
Sandra Kalil BussadoriRehabilitation Sciences and Biophotonics Applied to Heath Science, University of Nove of Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Iara Denise Endruweit BattistiFederal University of Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Cerro Largo, RS, Brazil.
Eusélia Paveglio VieiraRegional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ), Ijuí, RS, Brazil.
Tiago Szambelan PompeoRegional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ), Ijuí, RS, Brazil.
Eliane Roseli WinkelmannRegional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ), Ijuí, RS, Brazil. elianew@unijui.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papacarie gel is an agent that eliminates the need for local anesthesia and reduces the need for using a drill. However, there is no information regarding the cost per procedure. Therefore we analyzed the cost, per procedure, of Papacarie gel compared to the traditional method (drilling), and performed a comparison between these methods of carious tissue removal. A randomized clinical trial was performed with 24 children with an average age of 5.9 years old. Of these children, 12 were boys and 12 were girls, which resulted in a total of 46 restorations. Patients were separated into: Papacarie group (caries removal with the chemical-mechanical method - Papacarie gel) and Drill group (caries removal with the traditional method - drilling). Values of the materials used in the procedures, heart rate (before, 5 minutes during, and after dental treatment), and the total consultation duration were recorded. A level of significance of 5% was adopted. Papacarie had a lower cost per procedure ($ 0.91) when compared to the traditional method ($ 1.58). Papacarie provided a cost reduction of 42% compared to the traditional method. Using local anesthesia ($ 2.17), the cost reduction increased to 58%. In the procedure using drill + Papacarie ($ 1.37), the cost reduction was 33%. Heart rate, consultation duration, and number of restorations were not statistically different. Papacarie shows an excellent cost benefit for minimally invasive removal of carious tissue and is a feasible alternative for public health care.

Indexed as

BrazilChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDental CariesFemaleHumansMalePapainPediatric DentistryTooth, DeciduousPapacariePapain

Identifiers

PMID30559343
PMCPMC6297251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.