SynthesisBMJ open2018
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-associated interstitial lung disease.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognosis and prognostic factors of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Antibodies against Ro52 in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are associated with objective sicca symptoms.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Effect of Novel Inflammatory Biomarkers on Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Pneumonia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Predictors of progression in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with interstitial lung disease.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Unmet needs and perspectives in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: A critical review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Interstitial lung disease associated with inflammatory myositis: Autoantibodies, clinical phenotypes, and progressive fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Lung microbiome alterations in patients with anti-Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome and interstitial lung disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Progressive pulmonary fibrosis in myositis-specific antibody-positive interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Analysis of risk factors of interstitial lung disease and mortality rates in Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Article
- Natural history and screening of interstitial lung disease in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorders.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021Review
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of Chinese dermatomyositis patients with malignancies.Medicine · 2020Article
- Advances in the identification and management of progressive pulmonary fibrosis: perspective from Chinese experts.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo clarify prognostic factors for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD).
designSystematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched through 9 August 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: The review includes primary studies addressing all-cause mortality of IIM-associated ILD. Potential prognostic factors were any clinical information related to the outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted relevant data independently and assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model and if inappropriate the results were reported qualitatively. Prognostic factors were determined based on statistically significant results derived from multivariate analysis.
resultsOf a total of 5892 articles returned, 32 were deemed eligible for analysis and cumulatively, these studies reported 28 potential prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. Each study was subject to certain methodological constraints. The four prognostic factors, which demonstrated statistically significant results on both univariate and multivariate analyses, were as follows: age (MD 5.90, 3.17-8.63/HR 1.06, 1.02-1.10 and 2.31, 1.06-5.06), acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia (A/SIP) (OR 4.85, 2.81-8.37/HR 4.23, 1.69-12.09 and 5.17, 1.94-13.49), percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) (OR 0.96, 0.95-0.98/HR 0.96, 0.93-0.99) and anti-Jo-1 antibody (OR 0.35, 0.18-0.71/HR 0.004, 0.00003-0.54) (univariate/multivariate, 95% CI). Other prognostic factors included ground glass opacity/attenuation (GGO/GGA) and extent of radiological abnormality. The quality of the presented evidence was rated as either low or very low.
conclusionsOlder age, A/SIP, lower value of %FVC, GGO/GGA and extent of radiological abnormality were demonstrated to predict poor prognosis for IIM-associated ILD while a positive test for anti-Jo-1 antibody indicated better prognosis. However, given the weak evidence they should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016036999.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.