ArticleBMJ open2018
Scoping review of priority setting of research topics for musculoskeletal conditions.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global research priorities for back pain, neck pain and osteoarthritis: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Reducing the burden of osteoarthritis in Australia: A 2024-2025 research priority-setting study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Mapping the future: identifying research priorities in rheumatoid arthritis with the James Lind Alliance approach.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Research priorities for physical activity and exercise management of people with knee and hip osteoarthritis: A multi-stage international priority-setting study from the OARSI Rehabilitation Discussion Group.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2025Article
- Article
- Involving people with lived experience when setting cerebral palsy research priorities: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- [DNVF Memorandum: Objectives and Methods of Physical Activity-Related Health Services Research].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024Article
- Prioritisation of clinical trial learning needs of musculoskeletal researchers: an inter-disciplinary modified Delphi study by the Australia & New Zealand musculoskeletal clinical trials network.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- [Need for Action and Research in Psychosomatic and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation from the Point of View of Rehabilitants and Individuals who work in Rehabilitative Care].Die Rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Comparing an in-person workshop and a postal Delphi survey for involving health service users in health care and health research prioritization.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Article
- Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Research priorities to reduce the impact of musculoskeletal disorders: a priority setting exercise with the child health and nutrition research initiative method.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- The environmental impact of health care for musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Methods for Identifying Health Research Gaps, Needs, and Priorities: a Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews.Bulletin of the National Research Centre · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDescribe research methods used in priority-setting exercises for musculoskeletal conditions and synthesise the priorities identified.
designScoping review. SETTING AND POPULATION: Studies that elicited the research priorities of patients/consumers, clinicians, researchers, policy-makers and/or funders for any musculoskeletal condition were included. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to November 2017 and the James Lind Alliance top 10 priorities, Cochrane Priority Setting Methods Group, and Cochrane Musculoskeletal and Back Groups review priority lists. The reported methods and research topics/questions identified were extracted, and a descriptive synthesis conducted.
resultsForty-nine articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Methodologies and stakeholders varied widely (26 included a mix of clinicians, consumers and others, 16 included only clinicians, 6 included only consumers or patients and in 1 participants were unclear). Only two (4%) reported any explicit inclusion criteria for priorities. We identified 294 broad research priorities from 37 articles and 246 specific research questions from 17 articles, although only four (24%) of the latter listed questions in an actionable format. Research priorities for osteoarthritis were identified most often (n=7), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (n=4), osteoporosis (n=4) and back pain (n=4). Nearly half of both broad and specific research priorities were focused on treatment interventions (n=116 and 111, respectively), while few were economic (n=8, 2.7% broad and n=1, 0.4% specific), implementation (n=6, 2% broad and n=4, 1.6% specific) or health services and systems research (n=15, 5.1% broad and n=9, 3.7% specific) priorities.
conclusionsWhile many research priority-setting studies in the musculoskeletal field have been performed, methodological limitations and lack of actionable research questions limit their usefulness. Future studies should ensure they conform to good priority-setting practice to ensure that the generated priorities are of maximum value. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017059250.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.