ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019
GPs' attitudes towards digital technologies for depression: an online survey in primary care.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Impact of Digitalization on European General Practice From the Perspective of General Practitioners: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- 'It is just a prediction; it's, like, not fact': youth attitudes towards risk prediction tools and personalised preventive interventions for depression and anxiety.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed-methods study.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Patient Adoption of Digital Use Cases in Family Medicine and a Nuanced Implementation Approach for Family Doctors: Quantitative Web-Based Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- E-mental health in Germany - what is the current use and what are experiences of different types of health care providers for patients with mental illnesses?Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Digital interventions to address mental health needs in colleges: Perspectives of student stakeholders.Internet interventions · 2022Article
- A Conceptual Framework to Design Connected Mental Health Solutions in the United Arab Emirates: Questionnaire Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Online therapy: an added value for inpatient routine care? Perspectives from mental health care professionals.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022Article
- Learnings from user feedback of a novel digital mental health assessment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Mental Health Screening in General Practices as a Means for Enhancing Uptake of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Observational Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Observational
- Article
- Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners' Views.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- Predicting Inpatient Aggression in Forensic Services Using Remote Monitoring Technology: Qualitative Study of Staff Perspectives.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital or electronic mental health (e-mental health) interventions can be useful approaches in reducing the burden of depression, with tools available for use in prevention, treatment, or relapse prevention. They may have specific benefit for primary care, as depression is often managed in this setting. However, little is known about attitudes and barriers among GPs towards e-mental health interventions for depression.
aimThis study aimed to assess attitudes, knowledge, use, and barriers for depression-focused e-mental health among GPs across the UK. DESIGN AND
settingAn online survey of self-selecting GPs in the UK conducted over a 10-day period in December 2017.
methodThe survey consisted of 13 multiple choice questions posted on the Doctors.net.uk (DNUK) website.
resultsIn all, 1044 responses were included; 72% of GPs reported using at least one type of e-mental health intervention for depression. Overall, GPs reported that e-mental health interventions are most effective when delivered in a guided way, rather than in an unguided manner. In addition, 92% of GPs reported that neither they nor their colleagues received e-mental health training.
conclusionA moderate number of GPs use e-mental health for depression in their services, and report it is likely that its use will increase. There is a gap in training and awareness of effective interventions. GPs consider guided e-mental health interventions to be most effective, in contrast to the unguided way it is mostly offered in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.