Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559108›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and resource implications: the NVP Impact Study.

Roger Gadsby, Verity Rawson, Edward Dziadulewicz, Ben Rousseau, Hannah Collings

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact and management of hyperemesis gravidarum: Current and future perspectives.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioavailability of CaribanDrugs in R&D · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy is not just 'morning sickness': data from a prospective cohort study in the UK.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  15. The chance of recurrence of hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roger GadsbyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Verity RawsonAlliance Pharma Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire.
Edward DziadulewiczAlliance Pharma Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire.
Ben RousseauAdelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, Cheshire.
Hannah CollingsAdelphi Values PROVE, Bollington, Cheshire.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is the most prevalent medical condition associated with pregnancy. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published its first guidelines for management of NVP in 2016, although many current treatments are off label, with only one recently licensed treatment for NVP in the UK.

aimTo identify the current practices for NVP management across the patient pathway, and estimate the economic burden to NHS services. DESIGN AND

settingThis was an observational, retrospective research study conducted in the Newcastle Gateshead Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) health economy area in England.

methodData were collected from GP practices, local hospital datasets, ambulance services (April 2013-March 2016), and the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset (2006-2016).

resultsEight GP practices participated in the study. In all, 15.2% of the total pregnant population presented with NVP. Treatment varied significantly between GP practices, and 33.6% of women re-presented to their GP. There was an annual increase in women admitted to hospital for NVP symptoms, with increasing length of stay per admission. Almost half (44.6%) of the calls to 999/111 from women experiencing NVP symptoms resulted in an ambulance dispatch. The annual cost of NVP to this health economy was estimated to be £199 804, which crudely extrapolates to £25 758 731 at UK level. Due to underestimations of costs, the impact to the UK NHS could be up to £62 373 961.

conclusionThere is considerable variation in current management practices for NVP outside of recently published guidelines, and this may result in substantial resource use and avoidable financial impact to the NHS.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysGeneral PracticeHospitalizationNauseaPregnancy ComplicationsVomitingAdultFemaleHumansMedical OverusePatient Care ManagementPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyUnited Kingdomgeneral practicenauseapregnancyprimary health carevomiting

Identifiers

PMID30559108
PMCPMC6400600
OpenAlexW2905281656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.