Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30559094›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Real-Time Therapist Support via Videoconference for Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Panic Disorder, and Social Anxiety Disorder: Pilot Single-Arm Trial.

Kazuki Matsumoto, Chihiro Sutoh, Kenichi Asano, Yoichi Seki, Yuko Urao, Mizue Yokoo, Rieko Takanashi, Tokiko Yoshida, Mari Tanaka, Remi Noguchi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety.Advances in psychiatry and behavioral health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kazuki Matsumoto *United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-6882
Chihiro SutohDepartment of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-8220
Kenichi AsanoResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3839-5733
Yoichi SekiUnited Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9620-8970
Yuko UraoUnited Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3112-4877
Mizue YokooResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5870-1019
Rieko TakanashiResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9814-738X
Tokiko YoshidaResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4410-7163
Mari TanakaResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-483X
Remi NoguchiResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-7172
Shinobu NagataResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3086-5585
Keiko OshiroResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0960-1323
Noriko NumataUnited Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0117-7740
Motohisa HiroseResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1915-7556
Kensuke YoshimuraResearch Center for Medical Economics Administration, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-9700
Kazue NagaiReseach and Education Center of Health Sciences, Gunma University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-2127
Yasunori SatoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-5126
Taishiro KishimotoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0557-8648
Akiko NakagawaUnited Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3825-7376
Eiji ShimizuResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-9338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder (PD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD). Patients in rural areas can access CBT via the internet. The effectiveness of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) has been consistently shown, but no clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of ICBT with real-time therapist support via videoconference for OCD, PD, and SAD at the same time.

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of videoconference-delivered CBT for patients with OCD, PD, or SAD.

methodsA total of 30 Japanese participants (mean age 35.4 years, SD 9.2) with OCD, SAD, or PD received 16 sessions of individualized videoconference-delivered CBT with real-time support of a therapist, using tablet personal computer (Apple iPad Mini 2). Treatment involved individualized CBT formulations specific to the presenting diagnosis; all sessions were provided by the same therapist. The primary outcomes were reduction in symptomatology, using the Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) for OCD, Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) for PD, and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) for SAD. The secondary outcomes included the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) for Quality of Life, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire for anxiety, and Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-SF). All primary outcomes were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 (baseline), 8 (midintervention), and 16 (postintervention) face-to-face during therapy. The occurrence of adverse events was observed after each session. For the primary analysis comparing between pre- and posttreatments, the participants' points and 95% CIs were estimated by the paired t tests with the change between pre- and posttreatment.

resultsA significant reduction in symptom of obsession-compulsion (Y-BOCS=-6.2; Cohen d=0.74; 95% CI -9.4 to -3.0, P=.002), panic (PDSS=-5.6; Cohen d=0.89; 95% CI -9.83 to -1.37; P=.02), social anxiety (LSAS=-33.6; Cohen d=1.10; 95% CI -59.62 to -7.49, P=.02) were observed. In addition, depression (PHQ-9=-1.72; Cohen d=0.27; 95% CI -3.26 to -0.19; P=.03) and general anxiety (GAD-7=-3.03; Cohen d=0.61; 95% CI -4.57 to -1.49, P<.001) were significantly improved. Although there were no significant changes at 16 weeks from baseline in EQ-5D (0.0336; Cohen d=-0.202; 95% CI -0.0198 to 0.00869; P=.21), there were high therapeutic alliance (ie, WAI-SF) scores (from 68.0 to 73.7) throughout treatment, which significantly increased (4.14; 95% CI 1.24 to 7.04; P=.007). Of the participants, 86% (25/29) were satisfied with videoconference-delivered CBT, and 83% (24/29) preferred videoconference-delivered CBT to face-to-face CBT. An adverse event occurred to a patient with SAD; the incidence was 3% (1/30).

conclusionsVideoconference-delivered CBT for patients with OCD, SAD, and SAD may be feasible and acceptable.

Indexed as

AdultAllied Health PersonnelAnxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPanic DisorderPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeVideoconferencingclinical trialcognitive behavioral therapyfeasibility studyobsessive-compulsive disorderpanic disordersocial anxiety disordervideoconference

Identifiers

PMID30559094
PMCPMC6315259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.