ArticleBiophysical journal2019
GROmaρs: A GROMACS-Based Toolset to Analyze Density Maps Derived from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA twist at high alkali ion concentrations: evidence against C-form DNA in solution.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Computational Evaluation ofCurrent computer-aided drug design · 2026Article
- Anle138b binds predominantly to the central cavity in lipidic Aβ₄₀ fibrils and modulates fibril formation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The α/β3 complex of human voltage-gated sodium channel hNaJournal of molecular modeling · 2025Article
- In situ architecture of the human prohibitin complex.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Binding mechanism and distant regulation of histone deacetylase 8 by PCI-34051.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Structural insights into the mechanism of phosphate recognition and transport by XPR1.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Learning Adsorption Patterns on Amorphous Surfaces.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Structure and dynamics of cholesterol-mediated aquaporin-0 arrays and implications for lipid rafts.eLife · 2024Article
- The novel function of an orphan pheromone receptor reveals the sensory specializations of two potential distinct types of sex pheromones in noctuid moth.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Multimodal binding and inhibition of bacterial ribosomes by the antimicrobial peptides Api137 and Api88.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Ensemble structure of the N-terminal domain (1-267) of FUS in a biomolecular condensate.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Protein ensemble modeling and analysis with MMMx.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Discovery of lipid binding sites in a ligand-gated ion channel by integrating simulations and cryo-EM.eLife · 2024Article
- From complex data to clear insights: visualizing molecular dynamics trajectories.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Elucidating anticancer drugs release from UiO-66 as a carrier through the computational approaches.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Ion selectivity and rotor coupling of the Vibrio flagellar sodium-driven stator unit.Nature communications · 2023Article
- LAWS: Local alignment for water sites-Tracking ordered water in simulations.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Structure and transport mechanism of the human calcium pump SPCA1.Cell research · 2023Article
- Conformational cycle of human polyamine transporter ATP13A2.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a computational toolset, named GROmaρs, to obtain and compare time-averaged density maps from molecular dynamics simulations. GROmaρs efficiently computes density maps by fast multi-Gaussian spreading of atomic densities onto a three-dimensional grid. It complements existing map-based tools by enabling spatial inspection of atomic average localization during the simulations. Most importantly, it allows the comparison between computed and reference maps (e.g., experimental) through calculation of difference maps and local and time-resolved global correlation. These comparison operations proved useful to quantitatively contrast perturbed and control simulation data sets and to examine how much biomolecular systems resemble both synthetic and experimental density maps. This was especially advantageous for multimolecule systems in which standard comparisons like RMSDs are difficult to compute. In addition, GROmaρs incorporates absolute and relative spatial free-energy estimates to provide an energetic picture of atomistic localization. This is an open-source GROMACS-based toolset, thus allowing for static or dynamic selection of atoms or even coarse-grained beads for the density calculation. Furthermore, masking of regions was implemented to speed up calculations and to facilitate the comparison with experimental maps. Beyond map comparison, GROmaρs provides a straightforward method to detect solvent cavities and average charge distribution in biomolecular systems. We employed all these functionalities to inspect the localization of lipid and water molecules in aquaporin systems, the binding of cholesterol to the G protein coupled chemokine receptor type 4, and the identification of permeation pathways through the dermicidin antimicrobial channel. Based on these examples, we anticipate a high applicability of GROmaρs for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations and their comparison with experimentally determined densities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.