Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558666›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Prognostic values of S100 family members in ovarian cancer patients.

Yang Bai, Liang-Dong Li, Jun Li, Xin Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Translational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. S100A6 Protein-Expression and Function in Norm and Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Influence of S100A2 in Human Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang BaiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Liang-Dong LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Jun LiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Xin LuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. 052108365@fudan.edu.cn.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 17ZR1403500Shanghai Sailing Program grants awarded 16YF1401100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExhibiting high consistence in sequence and structure, S100 family members are interchangeable in function and they show a wide spectrum of biological processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, migration, inflammation and differentiation and the like. While the prognostic value of each individual S100 in ovarian cancer is still elusive. In current study, we investigated the prognostic value of S100 family members in the ovarian cancer.

methodsWe used the Kaplan Meier plotter (KM plotter) database, in which updated gene expression data and survival information are from 1657 ovarian cancer patients, to assess the relevance of individual S100 family mRNA expression to overall survival in various ovarian cancer subtypes and different clinicopathological features.

resultsIt was found that high expression of S100A2 (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.04-1.34, P = 0.012), S100A7A (HR = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.04-1.63, P = 0.02),S100A10 (HR = 1.2, 95%CI: 1.05-1.38, P = 0.0087),and S100A16 (HR = 1.23, 95%CI: 1-1.51, P = 0.052) were significantly correlated with worse OS in all ovarian cancer patients, while the expression of S100A1 (HR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, P = 0.039), S100A3 (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71-0.96, P = 0.0011), S100A5 (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.73-0.97, P = 0.017), S100A6 (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.98, P = 0.024), S100A13 (HR = 0.85, 95%CI:0.75-0.97, P = 0.014) and S100G (HR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.74-0.99, P = 0.041) were associated with better prognosis. Furthermore, we assessed the prognostic value of S100 expression in different subtypes and the clinicopathological features, including pathological grades, clinical stages and TP53 mutation status, of ovarian cancer patients.

conclusionComprehensive understanding of the S100 family members may have guiding significance for the diagnosis and outcome of ovarian cancer patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMutationNeoplasm GradingOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisS100 ProteinsSurvival AnalysisTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorS100 ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Kaplan Meier plotterOvarian cancerPrognosisS100 family

Identifiers

PMID30558666
PMCPMC6296138
OpenAlexW2904776046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.