Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558644›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2018

Rejuvenation by cell reprogramming: a new horizon in gerontology.

Rodolfo G Goya, Marianne Lehmann, Priscila Chiavellini, Martina Canatelli-Mallat, Claudia B Hereñú, Oscar A Brown

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Wandering along the epigenetic timeline.Clinical epigenetics · 2020
    Review
  12. Stem cells: past, present, and future.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodolfo G GoyaInstitute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP) - Histology B & Pathology B, School of Medicine, National University of La Plata, CC 455, 1900, La Plata, Argentina. goya@isis.unlp.edu.ar.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-5499
Marianne LehmannInstitute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP) - Histology B & Pathology B, School of Medicine, National University of La Plata, CC 455, 1900, La Plata, Argentina.
Priscila ChiavelliniInstitute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP) - Histology B & Pathology B, School of Medicine, National University of La Plata, CC 455, 1900, La Plata, Argentina.
Martina Canatelli-MallatInstitute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP) - Histology B & Pathology B, School of Medicine, National University of La Plata, CC 455, 1900, La Plata, Argentina.
Claudia B HereñúInstitute for Experimental Pharmacology Cordoba(IFEC), School of Chemical Sciences, National University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina.
Oscar A BrownInstitute for Biochemical Research (INIBIOLP) - Histology B & Pathology B, School of Medicine, National University of La Plata, CC 455, 1900, La Plata, Argentina.
Biochemistry Research Institute of La Plata · ARUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba · AR

Funding

Medical Research Charitable Foundation and the Society for Experimental Gerontological Research MRCF10-10-18National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology PICT15-0817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of animal cloning and subsequent development of cell reprogramming technology were quantum leaps as they led to the achievement of rejuvenation by cell reprogramming and the emerging view that aging is a reversible epigenetic process. Here, we will first summarize the experimental achievements over the last 7 years in cell and animal rejuvenation. Then, a comparison will be made between the principles of the cumulative DNA damage theory of aging and the basic facts underlying the epigenetic model of aging, including Horvath's epigenetic clock. The third part will apply both models to two natural processes, namely, the setting of the aging clock in the mammalian zygote and the changes in the aging clock along successive generations in mammals. The first study demonstrating that skin fibroblasts from healthy centenarians can be rejuvenated by cell reprogramming was published in 2011 and will be discussed in some detail. Other cell rejuvenation studies in old humans and rodents published afterwards will be very briefly mentioned. The only in vivo study reporting that a number of organs of old progeric mice can be rejuvenated by cyclic partial reprogramming will also be described in some detail. The cumulative DNA damage theory of aging postulates that as an animal ages, toxic reactive oxygen species generated as byproducts of the mitochondria during respiration induce a random and progressive damage in genes thus leading cells to a progressive functional decline. The epigenetic model of aging postulates that there are epigenetic marks of aging that increase with age, leading to a progressive derepression of DNA which in turn causes deregulated expression of genes that disrupt cell function. The cumulative DNA damage model of aging fails to explain the resetting of the aging clock at the time of conception as well as the continued vitality of species as millenia go by. In contrast, the epigenetic model of aging straightforwardly explains both biologic phenomena. A plausible initial application of rejuvenation in vivo would be preventing adult individuals from aging thus eliminating a major risk factor for end of life pathologies. Further, it may allow the gradual achievement of whole body rejuvenation.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEpigenomicsHumansMiceAgingCell reprogrammingEpigeneticsRejuvenationTherapeutic potential

Identifiers

PMID30558644
PMCPMC6296020
OpenAlexW2905034487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.