Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558612›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Opportunities for linking research to policy: lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network.

ANSER, Emilomo Ogbe, Dirk Van Braeckel, Marleen Temmerman, Elin C Larsson, Ines Keygnaert, Wilson De Los Reyes Aragón, Feng Cheng, Gunta Lazdane, Diane Cooper and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

ANSER
Emilomo OgbeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. emilomo.ogbe@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-3405
Dirk Van BraeckelInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marleen TemmermanGhent University, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elin C LarssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University/Karolinska Institutet, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ines KeygnaertInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wilson De Los Reyes AragónRFSU - the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education, Stockholm, Sweden.
Feng ChengSchool of Medicine and Research Centre for Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Gunta LazdaneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Diane CooperSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Simukai ShamuFoundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Peter GichangiUniversity of Nairobi, Ghent University and International Centre for Reproductive Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sónia DiasEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hazel BarrettCentre for Trust, Peace and Social relations, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Anne NobelsInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kaiyan PeiNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, China.
Anna GalleInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tammary EshoDepartment of Community and Public Health, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Lucia KnightSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hanani TabanaSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Olivier DegommeInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work.

methodsA participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes.

resultsThe workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings.

conclusionThe engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchPolicy MakingReproductive HealthSexual HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdministrative PersonnelHumansReproductive RightsResearch PersonnelStakeholder ParticipationANSERglobal healthhealth policyresearchSexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID30558612
PMCPMC6297973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.