Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558607›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2018

Optimising the antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial (APPAC II trial).

J Haijanen, S Sippola, J Grönroos, T Rautio, P Nordström, T Rantanen, M Aarnio, I Ilves, S Hurme, H Marttila and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03236961 (Optimizing the Antibiotic Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03236961 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Optimizing the Antibiotic Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: a Prospective Randomised Multicenter Study (The APPAC II Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2017 to 2029Enrolled552ConditionsAcute AppendicitisArmsErtapenem, Moxifloxacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Uncomplicated and Complicated Acute Appendicitis Induce Different Cytokine Patterns.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Is non-operative treatment of acute appendicitis possible: A narrative review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. The role of CT in decision for acute appendicitis treatment.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of COVID-19 on emergency general surgery admissions and operative volumes: A single centre experience.The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

J HaijanenDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.
S SippolaDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.
J GrönroosDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.
T RautioDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
P NordströmDivision of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
T RantanenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
M AarnioDepartment of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
I IlvesDepartment of Surgery, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland.
S HurmeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
H MarttilaDepartment of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Control, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
J VirtanenDepartment of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
A MattilaDepartment of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
H PaajanenDepartment of Surgery, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland.
P SalminenDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland. paulina.salminen@tyks.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-9264
APPAC study group
University of Turku · FIMoisio Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FIOulu University Hospital · FISeinäjoki University of Applied Sciences · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on epidemiological and clinical data acute appendicitis can present either as uncomplicated (70-80%) or complicated (20-30%) disease. Recent studies have shown that antibiotic therapy is both safe and cost-effective for a CT-scan confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, based on the study protocols to ensure patient safety, these randomised studies used mainly broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics requiring additional hospital resources and prolonged hospital stay. As we now know that antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis is feasible and safe, further studies evaluating optimisation of the antibiotic treatment regarding both antibiotic spectrum and shorter hospital stay are needed to evaluate antibiotics as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

methodsAPPAC II trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing per oral (p.o.) antibiotic monotherapy with intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy followed by p.o. antibiotics in the treatment of CT-scan confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Adult patients with CT-scan diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendicitis will be enrolled in nine Finnish hospitals. The intended sample size is 552 patients. Primary endpoint is the success of the randomised treatment, defined as resolution of acute appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital without the need for surgical intervention and no recurrent appendicitis during one-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints include post-intervention complications, late recurrence of acute appendicitis after one year, duration of hospital stay, pain, quality of life, sick leave and treatment costs. Primary endpoint will be evaluated in two stages: point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated for both groups and proportion difference between groups with 95% CI will be calculated and evaluated based on 6 percentage point non-inferiority margin. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, APPAC II trial is the first randomised controlled trial comparing per oral antibiotic monotherapy with intravenous antibiotic therapy continued by per oral antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC II trial aims to add clinical evidence on the debated role of antibiotics as the first-line treatment for a CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis as well as to optimise the non-operative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov , NCT03236961, retrospectively registered on the 2nd of August 2017.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAppendicitisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseAdministration, IntravenousCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFinlandHumansLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute appendicitisAntibiotic therapyAppendicitisLow-dose CTNon-operative treatmentUncomplicated appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID30558607
PMCPMC6296129
OpenAlexW2905447204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.