Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558599›Full record

ReviewBMC veterinary research2018

Prebiotics and synbiotics - in ovo delivery for improved lifespan condition in chicken.

M Siwek, A Slawinska, K Stadnicka, J Bogucka, A Dunislawska, M Bednarczyk

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Establishment of In OvoAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Coencapsulation of MultistrainInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SiwekDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland. siwek@utp.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-5174
A SlawinskaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
K StadnickaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
J BoguckaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Physiotherapy and Nutrition, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
A DunislawskaDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
M BednarczykDepartment of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka, 28 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

MIUR Rome Italy #RBSI14WZCLNarodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2013/11/B/NZ9/00783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercially produced chickens have become key food-producing animals in the global food system. The scale of production in industrial settings has changed management systems to a point now very far from traditional methods. During the perinatal period, newly hatched chicks undergo processing, vaccination and transportation, which introduces a gap in access to feed and water. This gap, referred to as the hatching window, dampens the potential for microflora inoculation and as such, prevents proper microbiome, gastrointestinal system and innate immunity development. As a consequence, the industrial production of chickens with a poor microbial profile leads to enteric microbial infestation and infectious disease outbreaks, which became even more prevalent after the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters on many world markets (e.g., the EU).This review presents the rationale, methodology and life-long effects of in ovo stimulation of chicken microflora. In ovo stimulation provides efficient embryonic microbiome colonization with commensal microflora during the perinatal period. A carefully selected bioactive formulation (prebiotics, probiotics alone or combined into synbiotics) is delivered into the air cell of the egg on day 12 of egg incubation. The prebiotic penetrates the outer and inner egg membranes and stimulates development on the innate microflora in the embryonic guts. Probiotics are available after the mechanical breakage of the shell membranes by the chick's beak at the beginning of hatching (day 19). The intestinal microflora after in ovo stimulation is potent enough for competitive exclusion and programs the lifespan condition. We present the effects of different combinations of prebiotic and probiotic delivered in ovo on day 12 of egg incubation on microflora, growth traits, feed efficiency, intestinal morphology, meat microstructure and quality, immune system development, physiological characteristics and the transcriptome of the broiler chickens.We discuss the differences between in ovo stimulation (day 12 of egg incubation) and in ovo feeding (days 17-18 of egg incubation) and speculate about possible future developments in this field. In summary, decades of research on in ovo stimulation and the lifelong effects support this method as efficient programming of lifespan conditions in commercially raised chickens.

Indexed as

LongevityAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeOvumPrebioticsSynbioticsPrebioticsBroilersDay 12 of egg incubationEmbryonic developmentGene expressionHatching windowIntestinal morphologyMicrofloraPerformanceSynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID30558599
PMCPMC6296066
OpenAlexW2904482662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.