ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Towards a supervised classification of neocortical interneuron morphologies.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-gate Weighted Fusion Network for neuronal morphology classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- A novel approach to cytoarchitectonics: developing an objective framework for the morphological analysis of the cerebral cortex.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2024Article
- Olfactory responses ofeLife · 2022Article
- nAdder: A scale-space approach for the 3D analysis of neuronal traces.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- NeuriteNet: A convolutional neural network for assessing morphological parameters of neurite growth.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021Article
- A community-based transcriptomics classification and nomenclature of neocortical cell types.Nature neuroscience · 2020Review
- Minimizing shrinkage of acute brain slices using metal spacers during histological embedding.Brain structure & function · 2020Article
- Axonal Tree Morphology and Signal Propagation Dynamics Improve Interneuron Classification.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- A Systematic Evaluation of Interneuron Morphology Representations for Cell Type Discrimination.Neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Classification of GABAergic interneurons by leading neuroscientists.Scientific data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe challenge of classifying cortical interneurons is yet to be solved. Data-driven classification into established morphological types may provide insight and practical value.
resultsWe trained models using 217 high-quality morphologies of rat somatosensory neocortex interneurons reconstructed by a single laboratory and pre-classified into eight types. We quantified 103 axonal and dendritic morphometrics, including novel ones that capture features such as arbor orientation, extent in layer one, and dendritic polarity. We trained a one-versus-rest classifier for each type, combining well-known supervised classification algorithms with feature selection and over- and under-sampling. We accurately classified the nest basket, Martinotti, and basket cell types with the Martinotti model outperforming 39 out of 42 leading neuroscientists. We had moderate accuracy for the double bouquet, small and large basket types, and limited accuracy for the chandelier and bitufted types. We characterized the types with interpretable models or with up to ten morphometrics.
conclusionExcept for large basket, 50 high-quality reconstructions sufficed to learn an accurate model of a type. Improving these models may require quantifying complex arborization patterns and finding correlates of bouton-related features. Our study brings attention to practical aspects important for neuron classification and is readily reproducible, with all code and data available online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.