Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558430›Full record

ArticleBiointerphases2018

Structure-property relationships for wet dentin adhesive polymers.

Ranganathan Parthasarathy, Anil Misra, Linyong Song, Qiang Ye, Paulette Spencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biointerphases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel methacrylate derivative polymer that resists bacterial cell-mediated biodegradation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ranganathan ParthasarathyDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Tennessee State University, 3500 John A Merritt Blvd, Nashville, Tennessee 37209.ORCID 0000000192687193
Anil MisraDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute for Bioengineering Research, University of Kansas, 5104B Learned Hall, 1530 W 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.
Linyong SongInstitute for Bioengineering Research, University of Kansas, 5104A Learned Hall, 1530 W 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.
Qiang YeInstitute for Bioengineering Research, University of Kansas, 5101E Learned Hall, 1530 W 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.
Paulette SpencerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute for Bioengineering Research, University of Kansas, 3111 Learned Hall, 1530 W 15th Street, Lawrence, Kansas 66045.

Funding

Peptide-Polymer Engineering Dentin/Adhesive Interfacial Bond IntegrityR01DE025476 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SPENCER, PAULETTE, TAMERLER-BEHAR, CANDAN · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
Proton Sponge Adhesives, Interfacial Milieu: Molecular Structure-MechanicsR01DE022054 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LAURENCE, JENNIFER S., SPENCER, PAULETTE · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022054NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dentin adhesive systems for composite tooth restorations are composed of hydrophilic/hydrophobic monomers, solvents, and photoinitiators. The adhesives undergo phase separation and concomitant compositional change during their application in the wet oral environment; phase separation compromises the quality of the hybrid layer in the adhesive/dentin interface. In this work, the adhesive composition in the hybrid layer can be represented using the phase boundaries of a ternary phase diagram for the hydrophobic monomer/hydrophilic monomer/water system. The polymer phases, previously unaccounted for, play an important role in determining the mechanical behavior of the bulk adhesive, and the chemomechanical properties of the phases are intimately related to the effects produced by differences in the hydrophobic-hydrophilic composition. As the composition of the polymer phases varies from hydrophobic-rich to hydrophilic-rich, the amount of the adsorbed water and the nature of polymer-water interaction vary nonlinearly and strongly correlate with the change in elastic moduli under wet conditions. The failure strain, loss modulus, and glass transition temperature vary nonmonotonically with composition and are explained based upon primary and secondary transitions observed in dynamic mechanical testing. Due to the variability in composition, the assignment of mechanical properties and the choice of suitable constitutive models for polymer phases in the hybrid layer are not straightforward. This work investigates the relationship between composition and chemomechanical properties of the polymer phases formed on the water-adhesive phase boundary using quasistatic and dynamic mechanical testing, mass transfer experiments, and vibrational spectroscopy.

Indexed as

Chemical PhenomenaDental CementsMechanical PhenomenaPolymersQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipDental CementsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID30558430
PMCPMC6296910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.