ArticleJournal of developmental biology2018
It's about Time: Ossification Center Formation in C57BL/6 Mice from E12⁻E16.
Article in Journal of developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03025763 (Craniosynostosis Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Craniosynostosis Network
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of soft tissue and bone interactions in the developmental integration and modularity of the skull in neural crest-specific gap junction alpha-1 knockout mice.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- Come together over me: Cells that form the dermatocranium and chondrocranium in mice.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025Article
- Unbiased profiling of multipotency landscapes reveals spatial modulators of clonal fate biases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal Wnts are required for morphogenetic movements of calvarial osteoblasts during apical expansion.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Embryonic and early postnatal cranial bone volume and tissue mineral density values for C57BL/6J laboratory mice.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022Article
- A dysmorphic mouse model reveals developmental interactions of chondrocranium and dermatocranium.eLife · 2022Article
- Postnatal development in a marsupial model, the fat-tailed dunnart (Sminthopsis crassicaudata; Dasyuromorphia: Dasyuridae).Communications biology · 2021Article
- The Chromatin RegulatorFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The establishment of precise, high-resolution temporal sequences for morphogenetic events in laboratory mice remains a vexing issue in developmental biology. Mouse embryos collected at the same period of gestation, even those from the same litter, show wide variation in individual levels of progress along their developmental trajectory. Therefore, age at harvest does not provide sufficient information about developmental progress to serve as the basis for forming samples for the study of rapidly or near-simultaneously occurring events such as the sequence of ossification center formation. Here, we generate two measures of individual developmental progress (developmental age) for a large sample of mouse embryos using crown⁻rump lengths that measures size, and limbstaging ages produced by the embryonic Mouse Ontogenetic Staging System (eMOSS) that measure shape. Using these measures, we establish fine-grained sequences of ossification center appearance for mouse embryos. The two measures of developmental progress generate slightly different sequences of ossification center formation demonstrating that despite their tight correlation throughout the developmental period, size and shape are aspects of form that are at least partially dissociated in development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.