Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30558278›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Artificial Intelligence-Based Grading Quality of Bovine Blastocyst Digital Images: Direct Capture with Juxtaposed Lenses of Smartphone Camera and Stereomicroscope Ocular Lens.

Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira, Vitória Bertogna Guilherme, Micheli Pronunciate, Priscila Helena Dos Santos, Diogo Lima Bezerra da Silva, José Celso Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Pre-Implantation Bovine Embryo Evaluation-From Optics to Omics and Beyond.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcelo Fábio Gouveia NogueiraLaboratory of Embryonic Micromanipulation, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. marcelo@assis.unesp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-9652
Vitória Bertogna GuilhermeLaboratory of Embryonic Micromanipulation, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. viihgui@gmail.com.
Micheli PronunciateLaboratory of Embryonic Micromanipulation, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. micheli_prtt@hotmail.com.
Priscila Helena Dos SantosLaboratory of Embryonic Micromanipulation, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. santos.priscilah@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-9652
Diogo Lima Bezerra da SilvaLaboratory of Applied Mathematics, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. diogolimabsilva@gmail.com.
José Celso RochaLaboratory of Applied Mathematics, Department of Biological Sciences, School of Sciences and Languages, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Assis, São Paulo 19.806-900, Brazil. jose.celso@unesp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2012/50533-2 and 2017/19323-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we developed an online graphical and intuitive interface connected to a server aiming to facilitate professional access worldwide to those facing problems with bovine blastocysts classification. The interface Blasto3Q, where 3Q refers to the three qualities of the blastocyst grading, contains a description of 24 variables that were extracted from the image of the blastocyst and analyzed by three Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) that classify the same loaded image. The same embryo (i.e., the biological specimen) was submitted to digital image capture by the control group (inverted microscope with 40× magnification) and the experimental group (stereomicroscope with maximum of magnification plus 4× zoom from the cell phone camera). The images obtained from the control and experimental groups were uploaded on Blasto3Q. Each image from both sources was evaluated for segmentation and submitted (only if it could be properly or partially segmented) for automatic quality grade classification by the three ANNs of the Blasto3Q program. Adjustments on the software program through the use of scaling algorithm software were performed to ensure the proper search and segmentation of the embryo in the raw images when they were captured by the smartphone, since this source produced small embryo images compared with those from the inverted microscope. With this new program, 77.8% of the images from smartphones were successfully segmented and from those, 85.7% were evaluated by the Blasto3Q in agreement with the control group.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSmartphoneSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBlastocystCattleNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligenceartificial neural networksbovine blastocystdigital image captureembryo gradingimage processingsmartphone camerasoftware

Identifiers

PMID30558278
PMCPMC6308431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.