Trial reportMedicine2018
Clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer as the late-line treatment.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for the therapy of locally advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Review
- The efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Efficacy of apatinib combined with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Investigational new drugs · 2022Article
- Regulatory Effects of Apatinib in Combination with Piperine on MDM-2 Gene Expression, Glutathione Peroxidase Activity and Nitric Oxide level as Mechanisms of Cytotoxicity in Colorectal Cancer Cells.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2022Article
- Efficacy of the Low Dose Apatinib plus Chemotherapy on Advanced Gastric Carcinoma.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Comparative efficacy and adverse reactions of apatinib-chemotherapy combinations versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Influence of KDR Genetic Variation on the Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Chemotherapy Refractory Metastatic CRC Who Received Apatinib Treatment.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Apatinib-loaded CalliSpheres Beads for embolization in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor: characterizationDrug delivery · 2020Article
- Apatinib in treating patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who had failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 plus apatinib for metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial.American journal of cancer research · 2020Article
- LncRNA, a novel target biomolecule, is involved in the progression of colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently no standard therapeutic regimen available for patients with advanced colorectal cancer in whom the disease continues to progress after 2 or more lines of chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for whom at least two lines of prior chemotherapy had failed.Twenty seven patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed at least 2 lines chemotherapy were treated with apatinib (500 mg/day). As a comparison control, 26 advanced colorectal cancer patients with comparable clinical baseline characteristics including age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, pathological type, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor location, number and location(s) of metastasis, and previous chemotherapies were subject to observation. Survival analyses were performed via the Kaplan-Meier method. The toxicity were evaluated in all patients this study according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 4 (NCI CTC version 4.0).A total of 53 well-matched patients with advanced colorectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 6.0 months (2.0-16.0 months). The median PFS was significantly longer for apatinib group than for observation group (2.0 vs. 1.1 months; HR = 3.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-7.88; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups for median OS (5.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.56-1.90; P = .914). The disease control rate of the apatinib group was significantly better than that of the observation group (70.4% vs 26.9%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in the overall remission rate between the 2 groups (3.7% vs 0%, P = .322). Advanced colorectal cancer patients with 2 or fewer metastatic sites experienced longer PFS than those with more than 2 sites. High ECOG scores, cancer localization to the right side of colon and lymph node metastasis were associated with increased risk of death and all remained independent factors affecting OS. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension and hand-foot skin syndrome.Apatinib treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed chemotherapy achieved better disease control and prolonged PFS relative to untreated controls. The toxicity was manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.