ArticleMedicine2018
Protocol for a systematic evaluation of pediatric pharmacy development and pediatric pharmacy experts' research area in China.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pediatric pharmacy research status of children's hospitals in China is still unknown. Our previous findings suggest the regional differences in academic level in tertiary (grade III level A) children's hospitals in China.
methodsThis systemic evaluation described in this protocol will be conducted to follow the Cochrane Handbook. We will perform a systemic literature search of relevant databases including Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Paper Check System) and English databases (Medline, EMbase, Cochrane Library) from inception to December 31, 2018. The search strategy will be enacted according to the guidance offered from the Cochrane Handbook. Two rounds of searches will be conducted to prevent the omission of relevant literature. A pre-set grading standard will be used to give calculation weight (W) to evaluate the quality of each article. Data synthesis will be performed using STATA software (version 13.1, Statacorp, College Station, Texas). Pediatric pharmacy development index (PPDI) of each hospital will be used to evaluate the pediatric pharmacy development in each tertiary children's hospitals. The cumulative calculation weight (∑W) and annual calculation weight (∑yearW) will be used to evaluate the academic level of pharmaceutical departments in different tertiary children's hospitals. Subgroup analysis will be performed to compare the number of different types of articles published between different hospitals base on different research areas such as policy research, basic research, and clinical research.
resultsIn this article, we will evaluate pediatric pharmacy development and the research area of pediatric pharmacy experts in China. Based on the results from this research, we will analyze the professional backgrounds of pediatric pharmacy experts from 23 tertiary children's hospitals in China. According to the contents and research directions of literature published by the pediatric pharmacy experts in these 23 hospitals, we will determine the professional field of pediatric pharmacy experts and establish an expert database. In the process of formulating the related national or local policies in the future, the expert database will be selected accurately to reach the expert consensus.
conclusionOur study will provide a comprehensive picture of pediatric pharmacy development in China. The pediatrics pharmacy expert's database constructed by this study will be used to build consensus on pediatric pharmacology in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.