Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30557498›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2019

Capturing Biochemical Diversity in Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) through the Application of Metabolite Profiling.

Margit Drapal, Elisabete Barros de Carvalho, Tatiana M Ovalle Rivera, Luis Augusto Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Paul D Fraser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margit DrapalSchool of Biological Sciences , Royal Holloway, University of London , Egham Hill, Egham , Surrey TW20 0EX , U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-8328
Elisabete Barros de CarvalhoSchool of Biological Sciences , Royal Holloway, University of London , Egham Hill, Egham , Surrey TW20 0EX , U.K.
Tatiana M Ovalle RiveraInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) , 6713 , Cali , Columbia.
Luis Augusto Becerra Lopez-LavalleInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) , 6713 , Cali , Columbia.
Paul D FraserSchool of Biological Sciences , Royal Holloway, University of London , Egham Hill, Egham , Surrey TW20 0EX , U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) is the predominant staple food in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and an industrial crop in South East Asia. Despite focused breeding efforts for increased yield, resistance, and nutritional value, cassava breeding has not advanced at the same rapidity as other staple crops. In the present study, metabolomic techniques were implemented to characterize the chemotypes of selected cassava accessions and assess potential resources for the breeding program. The metabolite data analyzed was applied to describe the biochemical diversity available in the panel, identifying South American accessions as the most diverse. Genotypes with distinct phenotypic traits showed a representative metabolite profile and could be clearly identified, even if the phenotypic trait was a root characteristic, e.g., high amylose content.

Indexed as

MetabolomeAmyloseGenotypeManihotMetabolomicsNutritive ValuePhenotypePlant BreedingAmylosecassavacharacteristic traitschemotypesdiversitymetabolite profilingmodern breeding approach

Identifiers

PMID30557498
PMCPMC6346375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.