Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30557395›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Systematic in vitro comparison of decellularization protocols for blood vessels.

Robin Simsa, Arvind Manikantan Padma, Philipp Heher, Mats Hellström, Andreas Teuschl, Lachmi Jenndahl, Niklas Bergh, Per Fogelstrand

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tissue compliance characterization for human umbilical arteries after decellularization.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Organoids technology in cancer research: from basic applications to advancedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin SimsaVERIGRAFT AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2889-1442
Arvind Manikantan PadmaLaboratory for Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Philipp HeherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology/AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria.
Mats HellströmLaboratory for Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-5618
Andreas TeuschlAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Lachmi JenndahlVERIGRAFT AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Niklas BerghDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Wallenberg Laboratory, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per FogelstrandDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Wallenberg Laboratory, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SELudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA · ATUniversity of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularization of native blood vessels is a promising technology to generate 3D biological scaffolds for vascular grafting. Blood vessel decellularization has been performed in previous studies under various experimental conditions, that complicates comparison and optimization of suitable protocols. The goal of this work was to systematically compare the decellularization and recellularization efficacy of 5 different protocols utilizing the detergents sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium deoxycholate (SDC), CHAPS and TritonX-100 together with DNA-removing enzymes on porcine vena cava in a perfusion bioreactor setup. Additionally, we tested the effect of DNase on the extracellular matrix (ECM) properties. We found that all protocols could efficiently decellularize blood vessels. Mechanical strength, collagen preservation and ECM integrity were similar among all tested detergents, yet TritonX protocols required long-term DNase application for complete decellularization. However, TritonX-based protocols showed the greatest recellularization efficacy with HUVECs in vitro. Furthermore, we developed a novel protocol for TritonX which improved recellularization and reduced total process time and ECM stiffness compared to previous protocols. SDS, SDC and CHAPS based protocols had a lower recellularization potential. In conclusion, decellularization of blood vessels can be achieved with all tested reagents, but TritonX treated ECM can be most efficiently recellularized with endothelial cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBioreactorsBlood VesselsCell SurvivalCollagenDetergentsEndothelial CellsExtracellular MatrixHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsSus scrofaTissue EngineeringCollagenDetergents

Identifiers

PMID30557395
PMCPMC6296505
OpenAlexW2904700332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.