Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30557390›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Increasing the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing by copy number variant analysis.

Daniel S Marchuk, Kristy Crooks, Natasha Strande, Kathleen Kaiser-Rogers, Laura V Milko, Alicia Brandt, Alexandra Arreola, Christian R Tilley, Chris Bizon, Neeta L Vora and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole exome sequencing: a new era in prenatal diagnostics.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification of a NovelMolecular syndromology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daniel S MarchukDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-2180
Kristy CrooksDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Natasha StrandeDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-9772
Kathleen Kaiser-RogersDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Laura V MilkoDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Alicia BrandtDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-0842
Alexandra ArreolaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Christian R TilleyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3519-8152
Chris BizonRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Neeta L VoraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Kirk C WilhelmsenDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
James P EvansDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Jonathan S BergDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

Funding

North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-gen Exome Sequencing 2U01HG006487 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERG, JONATHAN S, POWELL, BRADFORD C. · 2012 to 2021
$22.7M
UNC BIRCWH CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMK12HD001441 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOGGESS, KIM A · 2000 to 2019
$9.3M
Early Genomic DiagnosisK23HD088742 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VORA, NEETA L · 2017 to 2020
$685k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006487NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001441NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD088742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As whole exome sequencing (WES) becomes more widely used in the clinical realm, a wealth of unanalyzed information will be routinely generated. Using WES read depth data to predict copy number variation (CNV) could extend the diagnostic utility of this previously underutilized data by providing clinically important information such as previously unsuspected deletions or duplications. We evaluated ExomeDepth, a free R package, in addition to an aneuploidy prediction method, to detect CNVs in WES data. First, in a blinded pilot study, five out of five genomic alterations were correctly identified from clinical samples with previously defined chromosomal gains or losses, including submicroscopic deletions, duplications, and chromosomal trisomy. We then examined CNV calls among 53 patients participating in the NCGENES research study and undergoing WES, who had existing clinical chromosomal microarray (CMA) data that could be used for validation. For unique CNVs that overlap well with WES coverage regions, sensitivity was 89% for deletions and 65% for duplications. While specificity of the algorithm calls remains a concern, this is less of an issue at high threshold filtering levels. When applied to all 672 patients from the exome sequencing study, ExomeDepth identified eleven diagnostically relevant CNVs ranging in size from a two exon deletion to whole chromosome duplications, as well as numerous other CNVs with varying clinical significance. This opportunistic analysis of WES data yields an additional 1.6% of patients in this study with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs that are clinically relevant to their phenotype as well as clinically relevant secondary findings. Finally, we demonstrate the potential value of copy number analysis in cases where a single heterozygous likely or known pathogenic single nucleotide alteration is identified in a gene associated with an autosomal recessive condition.

Indexed as

DiagnosisDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30557390
PMCPMC6296659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.