Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30557358›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Bayesian inference of protein conformational ensembles from limited structural data.

Wojciech Potrzebowski, Jill Trewhella, Ingemar Andre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Autonomous screening of complex phase spaces using Bayesian optimization for SAXS measurements.Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Automatic Bayesian Weighting for SAXS Data.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Reconciling Simulations and Experiments With BICePs: A Review.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Bayesian inference of chromatin structure ensembles from population-averaged contact data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wojciech PotrzebowskiData Management and Software Centre, European Spallation Source ERIC, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-6779
Jill TrewhellaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ingemar AndreBiochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-8233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many proteins consist of folded domains connected by regions with higher flexibility. The details of the resulting conformational ensemble play a central role in controlling interactions between domains and with binding partners. Small-Angle Scattering (SAS) is well-suited to study the conformational states adopted by proteins in solution. However, analysis is complicated by the limited information content in SAS data and care must be taken to avoid constructing overly complex ensemble models and fitting to noise in the experimental data. To address these challenges, we developed a method based on Bayesian statistics that infers conformational ensembles from a structural library generated by all-atom Monte Carlo simulations. The first stage of the method involves a fast model selection based on variational Bayesian inference that maximizes the model evidence of the selected ensemble. This is followed by a complete Bayesian inference of population weights in the selected ensemble. Experiments with simulated ensembles demonstrate that model evidence is capable of identifying the correct ensemble and that correct number of ensemble members can be recovered up to high level of noise. Using experimental data, we demonstrate how the method can be extended to include data from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and structural energies of conformers extracted from the all-atom energy functions. We show that the data from SAXS, NMR chemical shifts and energies calculated from conformers can work synergistically to improve the definition of the conformational ensemble.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein ConformationAnimalsBayes TheoremCalmodulinCarrier ProteinsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodMyosin Binding Protein CNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein DomainsProtein FoldingProteinsCalmodulinCarrier ProteinsMyosin Binding Protein CProteins

Identifiers

PMID30557358
PMCPMC6312354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.