Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556835›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2019

Diagnostic Errors in Initial Misdiagnosis of Optic Nerve Sheath Meningiomas.

Pinar Kahraman-Koytak, Beau B Bruce, Jason H Peragallo, Nancy J Newman, Valérie Biousse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic Error in Neuro-ophthalmology: Avenues to Improve.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Primary and Secondary Optic Nerve Sheath Meningioma.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optic disc and peripapillary tumors.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pinar Kahraman-KoytakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Beau B BruceDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jason H PeragalloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nancy J NewmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Valérie BiousseDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USEmory and Henry College · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Diagnostic errors can lead to the initial misdiagnosis of optic nerve sheath meningiomas (ONSM), which can lead to vision loss. Objective: To identify factors contributing to the initial misdiagnosis of ONSM. Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively reviewed 35 of 39 patients with unilateral ONSM (89.7%) who were seen in the tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice at Emory University School of Medicine between January 2002 and March 2017. The Diagnosis Error Evaluation and Research taxonomy tool was applied to cases with missed/delayed diagnoses. Exposures: Evaluation in a neuro-ophthalmology clinic. Main Outcomes and Measures: Identifying the cause of diagnostic errors for patients who initially received a misdiagnosis who were found to have ONSM. Results: Of 35 patients with unilateral ONSM (30 women [85.7%]; mean [SD] age, 45.26 [15.73] years), 25 (71%) had a diagnosis delayed for a mean (SD) of 62.60 (89.26) months. The most common diagnostic error (19 of 25 [76%]) was clinician assessment failure (errors in hypothesis generation and weighing), followed by errors in diagnostic testing (15 of 25 [60%]). The most common initial misdiagnosis was optic neuritis (12 of 25 [48%]), followed by the failure to recognize optic neuropathy in patients with ocular disorders. Five patients who received a misdiagnosis (20%) underwent unnecessary lumbar puncture, 12 patients (48%) unnecessary laboratory tests, and 6 patients (24%) unnecessary steroid treatment. Among the 16 patients who initially received a misdiagnosis that was later correctly diagnosed at our institution, 11 (68.8%) had prior magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results that were read as healthy; 5 (45.5%) showed ONSM but were misread by a non-neuroradiologist and 6 (54.5%) were performed incorrectly (no orbital sequence or contrast). Sixteen of the 25 patients (64%) had a poor visual outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Biased preestablished diagnoses, inaccurate funduscopic examinations, a failure to order the correct test (MRI brain/orbits with contrast), and a failure to correctly interpret MRI results were the most common sources of diagnostic errors and delayed diagnosis with worse visual outcomes and increased cost (more visits and tests). Easier access to neuro-ophthalmologists, improved diagnostic strategies, and education regarding neuroimaging should help prevent diagnostic errors.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedOptic Nerve DiseasesOptic NeuritisVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30556835
PMCPMC6439718
OpenAlexW2904805196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.