Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556780›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2018

Myths about "The myths about work addiction".

Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Wilmar B Schaufeli, Ståle Pallesen

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Workaholism and the Enactment of Bullying Behavior at Work: A Prospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Workload, Workaholism, and Job Performance: Uncovering Their Complex Relationship.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cecilie Schou Andreassen1 Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Studies, University of Stavanger , Stavanger, Norway.
Wilmar B Schaufeli3 Research Unit Occupational & Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium.
Ståle Pallesen5 Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper encompasses a response to the debate paper by Griffiths et al. about work addiction myths. Generally, we found weak empirical basis for the statement that there exist major myths and controversies regarding work addiction. Although we agree with Griffiths et al. on several issues, we argue that: (a) although work addiction is not a new behavioral addiction, work addiction research is still in its infancy; (b) work addiction is largely similar to other behavioral addictions; (c) work addiction and workaholism are actually the same; and (d) there is no compelling evidence that work addiction occurs before adulthood.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveFrailtyAdultHumansmythswork addictionworkaholism

Identifiers

PMID30556780
PMCPMC6376365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.