Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556752›Full record

ArticleExpert review of proteomics2019

Cancer biomarker discovery and translation: proteomics and beyond.

Ventzislava A Hristova, Daniel W Chan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of proteomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Investigation of TMEM41A's function in breast cancer prognosis and its connection to immune cell infiltration.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ventzislava A Hristovaa Department of Pathology , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Daniel W Chana Department of Pathology , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.

Funding

Clinical and Analytical Validation of Cancer BiomarkersU24CA115102 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, DANIEL WANYUI · 2005 to 2021
$7.4M
The Comprehensive Proteome Characterization Center at Johns Hopkins: High Precision Discovery and Confirmation of Genoproteomic TargetsU24CA210985 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, DANIEL WANYUI, ZHANG, HUI · 2016 to 2020
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA115102NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer is often diagnosed at late stages when the chance of cure is relatively low and although research initiatives in oncology discover many potential cancer biomarkers, few transition to clinical applications. This review addresses the current landscape of cancer biomarker discovery and translation with a focus on proteomics and beyond. Areas covered: The review examines proteomic and genomic techniques for cancer biomarker detection and outlines advantages and challenges of integrating multiple omics approaches to achieve optimal sensitivity and address tumor heterogeneity. This discussion is based on a systematic literature review and direct participation in translational studies. Expert commentary: Identifying aggressive cancers early on requires improved sensitivity and implementation of biomarkers representative of tumor heterogeneity. During the last decade of genomic and proteomic research, significant advancements have been made in next generation sequencing and mass spectrometry techniques. This in turn has led to a dramatic increase in identification of potential genomic and proteomic cancer biomarkers. However, limited successes have been shown with translation of these discoveries into clinical practice. We believe that the integration of these omics approaches is the most promising molecular tool for comprehensive cancer evaluation, early detection and transition to Precision Medicine in oncology.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsProteomicsBiomarkers, Tumorbiomarker discoveryCancer biomarkermulti-omicsproteomicstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID30556752
PMCPMC6635916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.