Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556730›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2019

Early life adversity and increased delay discounting: Findings from the Family Health Patterns project.

Ashley Acheson, Andrea S Vincent, Andrew Cohoon, William R Lovallo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119503 (Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06119503 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsBehavior, HealthArmsElongating Time HOrizons for Reentry (ETHoR), Standardized Episodic Thinking (SET)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral processes and risk for problem substance use in adolescents.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley AchesonPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Andrea S VincentCognitive Science Research Center, University of Oklahoma.
Andrew CohoonBehavioral Sciences Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
William R LovalloBehavioral Sciences Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Funding

Psychophysiological Precursors of AlcoholismR01AA012207 · NIAAA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ACHESON, ASHLEY, KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2001 to 2025
$9.0M
Arkansas Biosciences InstituteNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research ServiceNIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased discounting (devaluing) of delayed rewards is associated with nearly all types of substance use disorders (SUDs) and is also present in individuals with family histories of SUDs. Early life adversity (ELA) likely contributes to these findings as it is common in both individuals with SUDs and their children and is linked to increased delay discounting and other neurocognitive impairments in human and animal studies. Here we examined data from 1192 healthy young adults (average age 23.6 years old) with (SUDs+) and without (SUDs-) histories of SUDs and with (FH+) and without (FH-) family histories of SUDs. A 2-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of SUDs (SUDs-, SUDs+) and FH (FH-, FH+) on delay discounting followed by an examination of the effects of adding ELA to the model. First, we replicated findings that SUDs+ and FH+ participants had increased rates of delay discounting. After taking ELA into account, the effect of SUDs and FH on delay discounting were both reduced but still significant. The association of ELA and delay discounting was similar in magnitude among both SUDs+ and SUDs- participants and FH+ and FH- participants; those with higher levels of ELA had increased delay discounting. Collectively, these findings indicate that increased ELA is closely associated with the increased delay discounting seen in SUDs+ and FH+ individuals and suggests ELA may be contributing to the increased delay discounting seen in these populations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesDelay DiscountingFamily HealthAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSubstance-Related DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30556730
PMCPMC6719544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.