ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2020
Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- High accuracy but limited readability of large language model-generated responses to frequently asked questions about Kienböck's disease.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- From quality to clarity: evaluating the effectiveness of online ınformation related to septic arthritis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Online Information Related to Symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Google Search Analysis.Cureus · 2023Article
- Accuracy of Online Pictorial Resources for Common Hand Surgery Procedures.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Readability and Quality Assessment of Online Materials for Syndactyly Release.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Dupuytren's Disease Information Available on the Internet.Cureus · 2021Article
- Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.