Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556253›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2019

The reality of "food porn": Larger brain responses to food-related cues than to erotic images predict cue-induced eating.

Francesco Versace, David W Frank, Elise M Stevens, Menton M Deweese, Michele Guindani, Susan M Schembre

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Addiction biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco VersaceDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
David W FrankDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Elise M StevensOklahoma Tobacco Research Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Menton M DeweeseDepartment of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Michele GuindaniDepartment of Statistics, The University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Susan M SchembreDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USIrvine University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
R25 SUPPLEMENT IN GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY EDUCATIONR25CA057730 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, SHINE · 1992 to 2016
$18.6M
Incentive salience and the neuropsychological underpinnings of cue-induced smoking relapseR01DA032581 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VERSACE, FRANCESCO · 2012 to 2024
$2.5M
Neurobehavioral Assessment of Reward Sensitivity in Young SmokersR21DA038001 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI VERSACE, FRANCESCO · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057730NCI NIH HHS R25CA057730NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032581NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA032581NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038001NIDA NIH HHS R21-DA038001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While some individuals can defy the lure of temptation, many others find appetizing food irresistible. The goal of this study was to investigate the neuropsychological mechanisms that increase individuals' vulnerability to cue-induced eating. Using ERPs, a direct measure of brain activity, we showed that individuals with larger late positive potentials in response to food-related cues than to erotic images are more susceptible to cue-induced eating and, in the presence of a palatable food option, eat more than twice as much as individuals with the opposite brain reactivity profile. By highlighting the presence of individual brain reactivity profiles associated with susceptibility to cue-induced eating, these findings contribute to the understanding of the neurobiological basis of vulnerability to obesity.

Indexed as

CuesEroticaFoodAdultAgedDisease SusceptibilityElectroencephalographyEndophenotypesEvoked PotentialsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightcue reactivityendophenotypesERPsincentive saliencelate positive potential (LPP)sign tracking

Identifiers

PMID30556253
PMCPMC6446735
OpenAlexW2951885205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.