Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30556053›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research

A Multimedia Support Skills Intervention for Female Partners of Male Smokeless Tobacco Users: Use and Perceived Acceptability.

Laura Akers, Judy A Andrews, Judith S Gordon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01885221 (A Multi-Media Approach to Partner Support in Smokeless Tobacco Cessation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01885221 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi-Media Approach to Partner Support in Smokeless Tobacco Cessation

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Research InstituteRan2012 to 2018Enrolled1,100ConditionsTobacco Use CessationArmsMultimedia Support Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of a Responsiveness-Based Support Intervention on Smokeless Tobacco Cessation: The UCare-ChewFree Randomized Clinical Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura AkersOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, United States.
Judy A AndrewsOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, United States.
Judith S GordonCollege of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

A Multi-Media Approach to Partner Support in Smokeless Tobacco CessationR01DA033422 · NIDA · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AKERS, LAURA · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: UCare is a new multimedia (website+booklet) intervention for women who want their male partner to quit their use of smokeless tobacco. The intervention is based on research showing that perceived partner responsiveness to social support is highest when the supporter conveys respect, understanding, and caring in their actions. The website included both didactic and interactive features, with optional video components, and special activities to help women develop empathy for nicotine addiction. The booklet reinforced the website content, encouraged women to use the website, and served both as a physical reminder of the intervention and a convenient way to share the information with her partner. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the utilization and acceptability of a multimedia intervention among women seeking to support their partner in quitting smokeless tobacco. Lessons learned with respect to design considerations for online interventions are also summarized. Methods: We present the evaluation of the intervention components' use and usefulness in a randomized trial. Results: In the randomized clinical trial, more than 250,000 visits were made to the website in a 2-year period, with the vast majority from mobile devices. Of the 552 women randomized to receive the intervention, 96.9% (535/552) visited the website at least once, and 30.8% (170/552) completed the core website component, "The Basics." About half of the women (287/552) used the interactive "Take Notes" feature, and 37% (204/552) used the checklists. Few women used the post-Basics features. At 6 weeks, 40.7% (116/285) reported reading the printed and mailed booklet. Website and booklet use were uncorrelated. User ratings for the website and booklet were positive overall. Conclusions: Intervention website designers should consider that many users will access the program only once or twice, and many will not complete it. It is also important to distinguish between core and supplemental features and to consider whether the primary purpose is training or support. Furthermore, printed materials still have value. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01885221; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01885221 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6zdIgGGtx).

Indexed as

multimediasocial supporttobacco cessationusability testingwebsite designwebsite developmentwebsite use assessment

Identifiers

PMID30556053
PMCPMC6294132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.