Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30555825›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018

Models for Cell-Free Synthetic Biology: Make Prototyping Easier, Better, and Faster.

Mathilde Koch, Jean-Loup Faulon, Olivier Borkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. What remains from living cells in bacterial lysate-based cell-free systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multi-Enzyme Assembly on T4 Phage Scaffold.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  10. Modeling Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Systems-Approaches and Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Future Trends in Synthetic Biology-A Report.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathilde KochMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, University of Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Jean-Loup FaulonMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, University of Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Olivier BorkowskiMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, University of Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free TX-TL is an increasingly mature and useful platform for prototyping, testing, and engineering biological parts and systems. However, to fully accomplish the promises of synthetic biology, mathematical models are required to facilitate the design and predict the behavior of biological components in cell-free extracts. We review here the latest models accounting for transcription, translation, competition, and depletion of resources as well as genome scale models for lysate-based cell-free TX-TL systems, including their current limitations. These models will have to find ways to account for batch-to-batch variability before being quantitatively predictive in cell-free lysate-based platforms.

Indexed as

cell-freemathematical modelmetabolismprototypingresource competitiontranscriptiontranslation

Identifiers

PMID30555825
PMCPMC6281764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.